首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >The risk of standards proliferation - An analysis of differences between private and public transport standards
【24h】

The risk of standards proliferation - An analysis of differences between private and public transport standards

机译:标准扩散的风险-私人和公共交通标准之间的差异分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper aims to explore differences between two institutional forms of standards: private and public. The research design is based on a survey study aiming to explore how security standards may impact differently on supply chain operations. The findings put in evidence main differences between standards in two different institutional forms: mandatory issued by governmental authorities and voluntary issued and disseminated through supply chains' inter-organizational relationships. The analysis only focuses on two certifications representing in turn authorities and private standards. Research implications indicate distinctions between mandatory public certification standards and private ones. Findings may support transport and logistics managers in the analysis and comparison of private and public certifications or standards for decision-making. Previous research has not analyzed differences between public and private security standards. In addition, researchers claim that security certifications can improve both security and efficiency. This paper indicates that this claim could present controversial results and therefore more attention needs to be paid by managers, policy makers and researchers.
机译:本文旨在探讨两种制度形式的标准之间的差异:私人和公共。该研究设计基于一项调查研究,旨在探讨安全标准如何对供应链运营产生不同的影响。研究结果以两种不同的制度形式证明了标准之间的主要差异:政府机构发布的强制性法规以及通过供应链组织间关系自愿发布和传播的标准。该分析仅关注于依次代表权威和私有标准的两个认证。研究意义表明强制性公共认证标准和私有认证标准之间的区别。调查结果可以支持运输和物流经理分析和比较私人和公共认证或决策标准。先前的研究尚未分析公共和私人安全标准之间的差异。此外,研究人员声称安全认证可以提高安全性和效率。本文表明,这种说法可能会引起争议,因此,管理者,政策制定者和研究人员需要给予更多关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号