首页> 外文期刊>Transportation research >Empirical study on car-following characteristics of commercial automated vehicles with different headway settings
【24h】

Empirical study on car-following characteristics of commercial automated vehicles with different headway settings

机译:不同前往不同前往商业自动化车辆的汽车跟踪特性的实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A recent study (Li, 2020) analytically predicted tradeoffs between automated vehicle (AV) following characteristics on safety, mobility, and stability using a parsimonious linear car following model. This work aimed to verify the key theoretical findings in the above study with empirical experiments using commercial AVs, e.g., vehicles with adaptive cruise control (ACC) functions. We collect high-resolution trajectory data of multiple commercial AVs following one another in a platoon with different headway settings. Parsimonious linear AV-following models that capture the first-order parameters on safety, mobility, and stability aspects are estimated with the data. The estimation results of the key parameters validate several theoretical predictions predicted by Li (2020). Specifically, it was found that as the time lag setting increases, the corresponding safety buffer decreases, indicating that AV safety could be improved with less pursuit of AV mobility or, conversely, AV mobility improvement may come at a cost of more stringent safety requirements. Also, as the time lag setting increases, AV string stability increases, indicating that stop-and-go traffic potentially could be dampened by compromising AV mobility. With this, one possible explanation to the observed string instability of commercial AV following control (i.e., ACC function) is that automakers may prefer to ensure a relatively short headway (and thus better user experience on vehicle mobility) at a cost of compromising string stability. It was also found that as the time lag increases, the cycle period of traffic oscillations gets longer, and the oscillation amplification gets smaller, which supports the tradeoff between mobility and stability. On the other hand, field experiments revealed issues beyond the predictivity of a simple linear model. That is, vehicle control sensitivity factors vary across different speed and headway settings, and the model estimation results for key parameters are not consistent over different speed ranges. This opens future research needs for investigating nonlinearity and stochasticity in the AV following modeling.
机译:最近的一项研究(LI,2020)在模型之后使用帕上线性轿厢的安全性,移动性和稳定性的特征,自动化车辆(AV)之间的分析预测折衷。这项工作旨在验证上述研究中的关键理论发现,使用商业AVS,例如具有自适应巡航控制(ACC)功能的车辆的实证实验。我们在具有不同前往设置的排彼此之后收集多个商业AVS的高分辨率轨迹数据。估计数据捕获安全,移动性和稳定性方面的一阶参数的ParsiMoirious线性AV-with的模型。关键参数的估计结果验证了LI(2020)预测的几种理论预测。具体地,发现随着时间滞后设定的增加,相应的安全缓冲器减小,表明可以通过较少的追求AV移动性来改善AV安全,或者相反地,AV移动性改善可能是以更严格的安全要求的成本。此外,随着时间滞后设置的增加,AV串稳定性增加,表明可以通过损害AV移动性来阻尼停止和去流量。由此,对观察到的商业AV的弦不稳定性(即,ACC功能)的一个可能的解释是汽车制造商可能更愿意以折衷串稳定性的成本,确保相对短的头路(以及因此更好地对车辆移动性的用户体验) 。还发现,随着时间滞后增加,交通振荡的循环周期变长,振荡放大变小,这支持移动性和稳定性之间的权衡。另一方面,现场实验揭示了超出了简单线性模型的预测性的问题。也就是说,车辆控制灵敏度因子在不同的速度和前往设置上各不相同,并且关键参数的模型估计结果在不同的速度范围内不一致。这将开启未来的研究需求,用于调查AV在建模下的AV中的非线性和随机性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号