首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Reducing sulfur and nitrogen emissions in shipping economically
【24h】

Reducing sulfur and nitrogen emissions in shipping economically

机译:在经济上减少运输中的硫和氮排放

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The abatement technology choices are complicated by the growing ban on open-loop scrubbers, the dawn of nitrogen emission control areas (NECAs) and the current drop of fuel prices. This paper develops a model to select the optimal technology choice that meets both sulfur limits and Tier III nitrogen limits, and applies it to three feeder services. The results show that the most economic choice is installing exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) with or without scrubbers, depending on different fuel prices and characteristics of ships and shipping services. Scrubber installation is more suitable for a new ship or the one with remaining lifespan equaling the lifespan of scrubbers. However, installing EGR without scrubbers is recommended for risk-averse shipowners as it is always optimal or nearly optimal. The paper also indicates that expanding the ban on open-loop scrubbers within territorial water areas only slightly impacts the technology choices for many feeder services.
机译:减少技术选择因缺乏开环洗涤器,氮排放控制区域(NECAS)的曙光和目前的燃料价格下降而复杂。本文开发了一种模型,可选择满足硫磺限制和三级氮限制的最佳技术选择,并将其应用于三个饲养服务。结果表明,根据船舶和航运服务的不同燃料价格和特点,最经济的选择正在安装有或没有洗涤器的废气再循环(EGR)。洗涤器安装更适合新的船舶或具有剩余寿命的寿命等于洗涤器的寿命。但是,建议为风险厌恶船主建议安装EGR而无需防罩,因为它始终是最佳的或几乎最佳的。本文还表明,在领海内扩展禁止在领海内的开环洗涤器上仅略微影响许多饲养服务的技术选择。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号