首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research Record >Freeway Detector Assessment: Aggregate Data from Remote Traffic Microwave Sensor
【24h】

Freeway Detector Assessment: Aggregate Data from Remote Traffic Microwave Sensor

机译:高速公路检测器评估:汇总来自远程交通微波传感器的数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Loop detectors have been the preeminent detection technology for several decades, but they require closing of the right-of-way during installation and potentially undermine the integrity of the pavement surface if they are not installed before paving. As a result, there is great interest in emerging technologies that promise traffic detection without the liabilities of loop detectors, many of which have already been deployed in large numbers. The remote traffic microwave sensor (RTMS) is among the most widely deployed noninvasive traffic detectors. This study evaluates the performance of the RTMS in side-fire mode relative to loop detectors in freeway applications. First, the aggregated data reported by the RTMS using its internal controller emulation are compared with data from nearby dual-loop detectors. It is shown that the RTMS measures are noisier than loop detectors for occupancy (percentage of time the detector is occupied by vehicles) and flow (number of vehicles per unit time), although the RTMS velocity estimates are almost as good as those from single-loop detectors (but inferior to direct measurement from dual-loop detectors). Second, the study considers aggregate measurements from contact closure data and compares the RTMS against the dual-loop detectors. For reference, the work also compares one loop against another in a dual-loop detector, with the spacing between loops being greater than the spacing between the reference loops and the RTMS detection zone.
机译:环形检测器已经成为数十年来最重要的检测技术,但是它们需要在安装过程中关闭通行权,如果在铺路之前未安装,则可能会破坏路面的完整性。结果,人们对新兴的技术产生了浓厚的兴趣,这些技术可以实现流量检测而又无需环路检测器,而环路检测器中的许多已经大量部署。远程交通微波传感器(RTMS)是部署最广泛的无创交通检测器之一。这项研究相对于高速公路应用中的环路检测器,评估了侧火模式下RTMS的性能。首先,将RTMS使用其内部控制器仿真报告的汇总数据与附近双回路检测器的数据进行比较。结果表明,RTMS的占用率(检测器被车辆占用的时间百分比)和流量(每单位时间的车辆数量)要比环路检测器高,尽管RTMS的速度估算值几乎与单次测量的结果一样好。环路检测器(但不如直接从双环路检测器进行测量)。其次,该研究考虑了来自触点闭合数据的总体测量结果,并将RTMS与双回路检测器进行了比较。作为参考,本文还将双回路检测器中的一个回路与另一个回路进行比较,回路之间的间距大于参考回路与RTMS检测区域之间的间距。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transportation Research Record》 |2005年第1917期|p.149-163|共15页
  • 作者

    Benjamin Coifman;

  • 作者单位

    Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ohio State University, Hitchcock Hall 470, 2070 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 交通运输;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号