首页> 外文期刊>Transportation research. Part C >Duration and frequency of telecenter use : once a telecommuter, always a telecommuter?
【24h】

Duration and frequency of telecenter use : once a telecommuter, always a telecommuter?

机译:远程办公的持续时间和频率:曾经是一个通勤者,总是一个通勤者吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The study of temporal patterns of telecommuting is essential in understanding the adoption of tele- commuting and, hence, the impacts of telecommuting on the demand for equipment and services as well as the demand for travel. This research examines, in the context of center-based telecommuting, how often individuals telecommute, the duration of their telecommuting participation, and causes of attrition among telecommuters. It also presents related findings from previous studies of home-based telecommuting. Attrition at the telecenters studied was relatively high, with 50/100 of all telecommuters quitting within the first 9 months. The average telecommuting frequency across the sample was 22/100 or about 1.1 days per week. Nearly 64/100 of the participants telecommuted less than l day per week on average. The relationship between frequency and duration appears to be complex, with partially counteracting trends. The results suggest that there is a stable segtnent of the sample (stayers) who are committed higher-frequency tele- commuters, but that within the segment having a propensity to quit, there is a slight but statistically sig- nificant tendency for higher-frequency telecommuters to quit sooner. The motivations of participants for quitting the program were investigated. The most frequent type of reason given was job-related (cited by more than a third of all quitters). Other important reasons were supervisor-related (16/100) and closure of the center (12/100). No one cited dissatisfaction with telecommuting as a reason for quitting, and most quitters expressed a desire to continue telecommuting from the center.
机译:对远程办公时间模式的研究对于理解远程办公的应用至关重要,因此,对于了解远程办公对设备和服务需求以及旅行需求的影响至关重要。这项研究在基于中心的远程通勤的背景下研究了个人远程通勤的频率,远程通勤的持续时间以及远程通勤人员的损耗原因。它还提供了以前基于家庭的远程办公研究的相关发现。在所研究的电信中心的人员流失相对较高,在前9个月内有50/100的通勤者退出。整个样本的平均通勤频率为22/100或每周约1.1天。平均将近64/100名参与者每周通勤少于1天。频率和持续时间之间的关系似乎很复杂,部分抵消了趋势。结果表明,从事高频通勤者的样本(住户)稳定,但在倾向于退出的人群中,高频有轻微但统计学上显着的趋势。通勤者要早点退出。调查了参与者退出该计划的动机。给出的最常见原因是与工作相关的(所有戒烟者中有三分之一以上被引用)。其他重要原因是与主管相关的(16/100)和中心关闭(12/100)。没有人将对远程办公的不满作为退出的原因,大多数退出者都表示希望从中心继续进行远程办公。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号