首页> 外文期刊>Transport policy >Travel using managed lanes: An application of a stated choice model for Houston, Texas
【24h】

Travel using managed lanes: An application of a stated choice model for Houston, Texas

机译:使用管理车道旅行:德克萨斯州休斯顿的既定选择模型的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Managed lane (ML) travel adds flexibility, but also complexity, to travel choices. Stated choice models (SCMs) are often used for modeling complex transportation choices such as these in an effort to predict demand for these travel options. The design methods for SCMs have evolved from simple orthogonal designs to more sophisticated designs such as D-efficient design that can increase efficiency in estimation. We used three different survey design strategies to produce the stated preference portion of surveys, which were used to elicit travel choices for a sample of Houston travelers. Apart from the D-efficient design we also used random and adaptive random designs to generate attribute levels. There were observable differences in choice behavior depending on what design strategy was used. These differences appear to influence estimates of the value of travel time savings (VTTS) obtained from the random parameter logit (RPL) models estimated using these data. This, in turn, would greatly impact the percentage of travelers predicted to use the MLs. The adaptive random strategy was superior to the other design methods in several categories, and it had similar efficiency to the D-efficient design. However, the mean of VTTS estimate obtained from a D-efficient design was closer to what is typically found in the literature. The difference was considerable and could greatly influence traffic and revenue estimates for the MLs, illustrating the importance of the survey design strategy.
机译:托管车道(ML)行程为行程选择增加了灵活性,但也增加了复杂性。陈述选择模型(SCM)通常用于对诸如此类的复杂交通选择进行建模,以预测对这些出行选择的需求。 SCM的设计方法已经从简单的正交设计演变为更复杂的设计,例如D高效设计,可以提高估算效率。我们使用了三种不同的调查设计策略来产生调查中所述的偏好部分,这些策略用于为休斯顿旅行者样本得出旅行选择。除了D效率设计之外,我们还使用随机和自适应随机设计来生成属性级别。根据所使用的设计策略,选择行为存在明显差异。这些差异似乎会影响从使用这些数据估算的随机参数对数(RPL)模型获得的行驶时间节省(VTTS)值的估算。反过来,这将极大地影响预计使用ML的旅行者比例。自适应随机策略在几个类别上均优于其他设计方法,并且其效率与D效率设计相似。但是,从D效率设计获得的VTTS估计值的平均值更接近文献中的典型值。差异是巨大的,并且可能极大地影响ML的流量和收入估算,这说明了调查设计策略的重要性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transport policy》 |2011年第4期|p.595-603|共9页
  • 作者单位

    RAND Europe, Westbrook Center, Milton Road, Cambridge CM 1VG, UK;

    Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, CE/TTI Building, Room No. 301-B, College Station, TX-77843-3136, USA;

    Department of Agricultural Economics and Research Fellow, Texas A&M University, Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, Blocker Building, Room No. 308F, College Station, TX-77843-2124, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    stated preference; managed lanes; survey design;

    机译:陈述的偏好;管理车道;调查设计;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号