...
首页> 外文期刊>Transport policy >Systematic construction risk, cost estimation mechanism and unit price movements
【24h】

Systematic construction risk, cost estimation mechanism and unit price movements

机译:系统的施工风险,成本估算机制和单价变动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Researchers have already proven significant systematic cost over-runs measured from the decision to build estimate even in the most developed countries of the world. The reference class forecasting was introduced to counter this bias. However, the precise workings or cost over-run determinants are however still under-researched. We selected the case of the National Highway Construction Program in Slovenia and projects, completed between 1995 and 2007. The purpose was to determine the precise cost performance through time and analyze the cost estimating mechanism to see whether and how it influences the cost performance. The details of the cost estimating practice have been studied and compared with the existing practice in the USA and elsewhere. A representative sample of 36 projects could be constructed, valued at USD 2.7 billion (2006 prices) with a total length of some 235 km. Almost half of the cost performance variance could be explained by the cost estimation mechanism (cost-based estimation with historic bid database). In different variants, this approach appears to be dominant in the most developed countries of the World due to its relative simplicity. We find, that due to the behavior of bidders in the tendering process, the same mechanism also implies that some systematic cost over-run will likely occur, even if no other causes were present. This adds a new perspective to the suggestions of Flyvbjerg and others, who suggested that the dominant (but not exclusive) cause for the persistence of systematic cost is strategic misinterpretation. The findings suggest that project sponsors should perform a supporting analysis on how price changes on the construction market feed in to the cost performance to further support the reference class forecasting approach. The findings also suggests, that in case of strong cost performance shifts, longer periods need to be included in the analysis, before one can conclude, that the improvement or worsening is not temporary and is not the inherent result of the cost estimating mechanism.
机译:研究人员已经证明,即使是在世界上最发达国家,也要根据建立估算的决定来衡量系统的超支费用。引入参考类别预测以克服这种偏差。但是,确切的工作原理或成本超支的决定因素仍未得到充分研究。我们以斯洛文尼亚国家公路建设计划和项目为例,这些项目在1995年至2007年之间完成。目的是确定时间上准确的成本绩效,并分析成本估算机制,以了解其是否以及如何影响成本绩效。已经研究了成本估算实践的细节,并将其与美国和其他地区的现有实践进行了比较。可以建设一个具有代表性的36个项目,总价值约235公里,价值27亿美元(2006年价格)。成本绩效差异几乎可以由成本估算机制(具有历史出价数据库的基于成本的估算)来解释。由于其相对简单,因此在不同的变体中,这种方法在世界上最发达国家中似乎占主导地位。我们发现,由于投标人在招标过程中的行为,相同的机制也意味着即使没有其他原因,也可能会发生一些系统的成本超支。这为Flyvbjerg等人的建议增添了新的视角,他们提出了导致系统成本持续存在的主要原因(但不是排他性的)是战略性误解。调查结果表明,项目发起人应该对建筑市场的价格变化如何影响成本绩效进行支持性分析,以进一步支持参考类别的预测方法。调查结果还表明,在成本绩效发生重大变化的情况下,需要进行更长的分析,才能得出结论,即改善或恶化不是暂时的,也不是成本估算机制的内在结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号