首页> 外文期刊>Transport policy >Job opportunities, institutions, and the jobs-housing spatial relationship: Case study of Beijing
【24h】

Job opportunities, institutions, and the jobs-housing spatial relationship: Case study of Beijing

机译:就业机会,机构与工作与住房的空间关系:以北京为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we use household travel survey data and employment establishment survey data collected in Beijing to empirically investigate the extent to which institutional arrangements influence the jobs-housing spatial relationship, and whether such arrangements interact with local job opportunities in shaping the jobs-housing relationship. Dynamic buffering is used to derive the number of job opportunities within specific distances of each home. We find that, once individuals have the freedom to choose their workplaces or homes, the "relics" of command-and-control housing provision policies no longer have significant influence on commute distances. We also find that more job opportunities close to homes have significant association with shorter commuting distances. This is especially true for individuals who joined the workforce after 1999. The institutional setup and spatial structure of the jobs and population in Beijing can contribute to this trend. Yet the magnitude of this effect from the job opportunities is nevertheless negligible.
机译:在本文中,我们使用在北京收集的家庭旅行调查数据和就业机构调查数据来实证研究制度安排在多大程度上影响工作与住房的空间关系,以及这些安排是否与当地的工作机会相互作用,从而形成了工作与住房的关系。关系。动态缓冲用于得出每个房屋特定距离内的工作机会数量。我们发现,一旦个人有选择工作场所或房屋的自由,命令控制住房供应政策的“传统”就不再对通勤距离产生重大影响。我们还发现,靠近房屋的更多工作机会与较短的通勤距离有很大关系。对于1999年以后加入劳动力大军的个人来说尤其如此。北京的工作场所和人口的机构设置和空间结构可以为这一趋势做出贡献。然而,工作机会带来的这种影响的幅度可以忽略不计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号