...
【24h】

RAPID RESPONSE

机译:快速反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The overriding priority for the emergency services -particularly ambulance and fire and rescue crews - is saving lives. So that primary function should drive every aspect of vehicle specification, build and maintenance. Obvious? Yes, of course. Yet, a combination of custom and practice, cost cutting and, ironically, even legislation and advancing technology, are in some instances getting in the way. How? Because they're conspiring on the one hand to squeeze engineering innovation and competition, and, on the other, to hinder these vehicles' driving progress. No doubt both are unintended consequences, but they're happening nonetheless. So why? Gary Stephenson, special vehicles engineering manager at Cartwright, has a wealth of experience in blues and twos, including formerly with O&H Vehicle Conversions and Alexander Dennis on its fire side. He gives the example of specifications for ambulances apparently written less by fleet engineers and more by paramedics and administrators. These may not only turn out to be unrealistic, but can also sap engineering attention and cost.
机译:紧急服务(尤其是救护车和消防救援人员)的首要任务是挽救生命。因此,主要功能应驱动车辆规格,制造和维护的各个方面。明显?当然是。然而,在某些情况下,习惯与实践的结合,成本的削减以及具有讽刺意味的是,甚至立法和先进技术的结合。怎么样?因为他们一方面密谋压缩工程创新和竞争,另一方面却阻碍了这些车辆的驾驶进度。毫无疑问,两者都是意料之外的后果,但是它们仍在发生。所以为什么?卡特赖特(Cartwright)特种车辆工程经理加里·斯蒂芬森(Gary Stephenson)拥有丰富的经验,包括曾在O&H Vehicle Conversions和Alexander Dennis担任消防方面的工作。他举例说明了救护车的规格,显然是由车队工程师编写的,而由护理人员和管理人员编写的则更多。这些不仅可能是不现实的,而且还会降低工程的注意力和成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号