首页> 外文期刊>Transnational environmental law >Influence of the EU Chemicals Regulation on the US Policy Reform Debate: Is a 'California Effect' within REACH?
【24h】

Influence of the EU Chemicals Regulation on the US Policy Reform Debate: Is a 'California Effect' within REACH?

机译:欧盟化学品法规对美国政策改革辩论的影响:REACH中是否存在“加利福尼亚效应”?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2006, the EU adopted the REACH Regulation - the world's most demanding chemicals regime so far. Even before it entered into force, the European Commission declared its ambition to make REACH a global standard, and several authors see a potential for far-reaching influence via the 'California effect', as conceptualized by David Vogel. Economic preconditions are indeed fulfilled with the chemicals industry being highly globalized, the EU as an attractive export market and REACH applying to imports. Following Vogel, firms exporting to the EU might have an incentive to lobby for similar requirements in their country. This article examines whether American chemical producers do, indeed, push for EU-like provisions in the debate on US policy reform. While there is some influence on the US, it is shown that REACH does not (yet) trigger a 'California effect'. The business case does not seem to be strong enough.
机译:2006年,欧盟通过了REACH法规,这是迄今为止世界上要求最严格的化学品制度。甚至在生效之前,欧洲委员会就宣布了将REACH成为全球标准的雄心,而许多作者认为,正如大卫·沃格尔(David Vogel)所设想的那样,通过“加利福尼亚效应”具有深远影响的潜力。化工行业高度全球化,欧盟作为有吸引力的出口市场以及适用于进口的REACH确实满足了经济前提。继Vogel之后,向欧盟出口的公司可能会有动机游说其本国的类似要求。本文探讨了美国化学品生产商是否确实在关于美国政策改革的辩论中推动了类似欧盟的规定。尽管对美国有一定影响,但事实表明,REACH尚未(尚未)引发“加利福尼亚效应”。商业案例似乎还不够强大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号