首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers >Biopolitics, discipline, and hydro-citizenship: Drought management and water governance in England
【24h】

Biopolitics, discipline, and hydro-citizenship: Drought management and water governance in England

机译:生物政治,纪律和水权公民:英格兰的干旱管理和水治理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper we argue that English drought management rests on two imaginaries of hydrocitizenship: an economic/instrumental imaginary that frames people primarily as "customers," and an imaginary that focuses more on the affectively charged, personal engagements between individuals and "hydrosocial" spaces. These imaginaries, we contend, roughly correspond with the two modalities of a form of governance referred to by Michel Foucault as biopower: biopolitics and discipline. Drawing on fieldwork conducted as part of a large interdisciplinary research project on drought in the UK, we sketch the contours of English drought management, exploring in particular the "macro-scale" elements of drought management (the biopolitical modality), premised on computer simulation modelling, and the elements of drought management that focus on the level of individual people (the disciplinary modality), premised in part on the work of local environmental organisations. The difference between the two notions of hydrocitizenship informing these two modalities of management, we conclude, produces tensions that potentially undermine water governance as it is currently organised in the UK. Ultimately, our goal in the paper is not solely to expose or critique existing governance efforts or the power relations therein, but rather to examine the interplay of governmentalities that constitute drought management in order to illuminate and expand the potential for "being governed differently."
机译:在本文中,我们认为英国的干旱管理基于两种水力公民身份的假想:一种将人主要定义为“客户”的经济/工具假想,而另一种假想则更侧重于个人与“社交空间。我们认为,这些假想大致与米歇尔•福柯(Michel Foucault)称为生物力量的一种治理形式的两种模式相对应:生物政治和纪律。借鉴英国大型干旱跨学科研究项目的一部分进行的实地考察,我们勾画了英国干旱管理的轮廓,特别探讨了干旱管理的“宏观”要素(生物政治形态),其前提是计算机模拟建模以及着重于个人水平(学科形式)的干旱管理要素,部分前提是当地环境组织的工作。我们得出结论,两种代表两种管理方式的水权化概念之间的差异导致了紧张局势,有可能破坏水治理,因为这在英国目前是组织的。最终,本文的目标不仅是揭露或批判现有的治理工作或其中的权力关系,而是研究构成干旱管理的政府之间的相互作用,以阐明和扩大“被不同治理”的潜力。 “

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号