首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers >The changing geographies of foreign aid and development cooperation:contributions from gift theory
【24h】

The changing geographies of foreign aid and development cooperation:contributions from gift theory

机译:对外援助和发展合作的地域变化:礼物理论的贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper critically evaluates the ways in which Southern development actors, such as India and China, discursively construct the 'aid' element of South-South development cooperation. It draws upon gift theory, something that has previously been confined to analyses of Western foreign aid. Four characteristic features of the symbolic regime of South-South development cooperation are identified: the assertion of a shared 'developing country' identity; expertise in appropriate development; rejection of hierarchical 'donor-recipient' relations; and an insistence on mutual opportunity. All of these set up the positive moral valence of reciprocity, something that stands in contrast to the hegemonic public construction (if not the reality) of Western foreign aid as unreciprocated charity to the less fortunate. The paper then examines what this symbolic regime might seek to 'euphemise' or obscure in the realpolitik of South-South relations, including inattention to the contested sub-national politics of 'development', and the growing differences amongst the G77 nations. The paper is concerned with the ways in which Southern development actors represent a challenge to the dominant aid paradigm, transgressing dominant cultural categories and social hierarchies of who gives and who receives; but it refuses to take claims of South-South solidarity and mutual benefit at face value. It concludes with some brief reflections on the implications of the emerging visibility and power of the Southern development partners for critical 'development' geography.
机译:本文批判性地评估了诸如印度和中国之类的南方发展行为体如何话语建构南南发展合作的“援助”要素的方式。它借鉴了礼物理论,这种理论以前仅限于分析西方外国援助。确定了南南发展合作象征制度的四个特征:主张具有共同的“发展中国家”身份;适当发展方面的专门知识;拒绝分层的“捐助者-接收者”关系;并坚持相互的机会。所有这些都建立了互惠互利的积极道德价位,这与西方外国援助的霸权公共建设(如果不是现实的话)形成鲜明对比,后者是对较不幸的人的不予回报的慈善。然后,本文研究了这种象征性政权在南南关系的现实政治中可能试图“委婉”或模糊的内容,包括对有争议的地方性“发展”政治的关注,以及77国集团国家之间日益扩大的分歧。本文关注的是南方发展参与者如何挑战主导性援助范式,如何超越主导性文化类别和提供者和接受者的社会等级;但它拒绝从表面价值上主张南南团结和互惠互利。文章最后总结了南方发展伙伴不断增长的知名度和影响力对关键的“发展”地理的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号