首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers >'Refugee' or 'returnee'? The ethnic geopolitics of diasporic resettlement in China and intergenerational change
【24h】

'Refugee' or 'returnee'? The ethnic geopolitics of diasporic resettlement in China and intergenerational change

机译:是“难民”还是“返回者”?中国流散移民的族裔地缘政治与代际变迁

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The interrelationship between forced migration, return migration and ethnicity remains relatively unexplored in current scholarship. By using the case of China's resettlement policy towards diasporic Chinese descendants expelled from Southeast Asia during 1949-1979 and examining their contemporary situation, this paper highlights the way scholarship on forced migration and ethnically privileged (return) migration can mutually enrich one another. The paper, first, examines the geopolitical context of Chinese forced migration and the premises of China's preferential policy towards co-ethnics, which labelled the 'refugees' as 'returnees' intentionally. It argues that metaphors of extraterritorial ethnic kinship and 'return' are used to justify ethnic privilege but the co-ethnics experienced socio-spatial exclusion in China because of their cultural distinctiveness. Second, the paper explores the impact of the post-1980s reforms on the rural overseas Chinese farms in which the co-ethnics were resettled. This discussion suggests that the rescaling of governance brought about policies that capitalise upon their distinctive Southeast Asian identities to reinvent the farms as economic zones and tourism sites. The sustainability of this economic strategy is, however, questioned in the third part of the paper, which considers intergenerational change now happening on the farms. It argues that international migration histories are transitioning to new internal migration flows. Such migration succession trends may transform the ethnically privileged status of the farms and their inhabitants. The qualitative findings in this paper direct broader inquiry into the complex ethnic geopolitics underpinning mobilisations of diasporic belonging and also the implications of intergenerational change.
机译:在目前的学术研究中,相对来说,强迫移民,回国移民和种族之间的相互关系还没有被探索。本文以中国对1949-1979年间从东南亚驱逐出境的华裔后裔的安置政策为例,并考察了他们的当代状况,强调了强迫移民学者和具有种族特权的人(回返)移民可以相互充实。本文首先研究了中国被迫移民的地缘政治背景以及中国对族裔的优惠政策的前提,这些政策故意将“难民”称为“海归”。它认为,用域外族裔血统和“回归”的隐喻来证明族群特权是正当的,但由于其文化独特性,同族人在中国经历了社会空间排斥。其次,本文探讨了1980年代后的改革对重新安置同族人的农村华侨农场的影响。讨论表明,治理的重新调整带来了利用其独特的东南亚身份的政策,以将农场重新改造为经济区和旅游胜地。但是,该经济策略的可持续性在本文的第三部分中受到质疑,该论文考虑了现在农场中正在发生的代际变化。它认为国际移民历史正在过渡到新的内部移民潮。这种移民继承趋势可能会改变农场及其居民的族裔特权地位。本文中的定性发现将更广泛的问题直接引导到了复杂的族裔地缘政治中,这些地缘政治为流离失所者的动员奠定了基础,同时也代代相传。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号