首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >CROP PRODUCTION SYSTEMS TO CONTROL EROSION AND REDUCE RUNOFF FROM UPLAND SILTY SOILS
【24h】

CROP PRODUCTION SYSTEMS TO CONTROL EROSION AND REDUCE RUNOFF FROM UPLAND SILTY SOILS

机译:作物生产系统,用于控制侵蚀和减少陆地粉质土壤的径流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Soil erosion remains the most significant threat to long-term agricultural sustainability. In order to determine if highly erodible silty upland soils could be row-cropped while conforming to the conservation provisions of the Food Security Act, we measured natural-rainfall runoff and soil loss for six years from eight alternative cropping systems on sixteen 4% slope plots and three small watersheds in north Mississippi. Several conservation cropping systems slightly reduced runoff and greatly decreased erosion on these soils. On erosion plots, no-till for soybean, corn, or sorghum reduced soil loss by more than 80% and no-till for cotton by more than 70% as compared to conventionally tilled soybean. Ridge-till was more than twice as erodible as no-till, while no-till soybean double-cropped with wheat was least erodible of the eight systems studied. On small watersheds, annual sediment yield ranged up to about 30 t/ha for conventional tillage soybean with buffer strips and grassed waterways but, after the first year, never exceeded 1 t/ha for no-till soybean. However, no-tillage alone was not adequate to control concentrated-flow headcuts. Most conservation systems decreased runoff by at least 10%. No-till sorghum or corn with a vetch cover crop generally decreased runoff most, and doublecropped soybean-wheat had less than 75% of the runoff of conventional soybean. Greatest reductions occurred during years of higher runoff amounts. Runoff per unit of area from the watersheds was much greater than from comparable erosion plots, indicating that extrapolation of plot data to field areas merits careful consideration of their relative soil and topographic characteristics. This research demonstrated that several no-tillage cropping systems can keep erosion below tolerable limits, reduce runoff somewhat, and be economically profitable. When combined with complementary conservation practices such as waterways and grass hedges, they provide methods for achieving both effective conservation and sustainable production when intensively cropping erodible upland soils of the southern United States.
机译:水土流失仍然是长期农业可持续性的最大威胁。为了确定高度侵蚀性的粉质旱地土壤是否可以在符合《粮食安全法》的养护规定的情况下进行耕作,我们在16个4%坡度地块上,对八个种植系统的天然降雨径流和土壤流失进行了六年测量和密西西比州北部的三个小流域。几种保护性耕作制度略微减少了径流并大大减少了对这些土壤的侵蚀。在侵蚀区,与传统耕作的大豆相比,免耕的大豆,玉米或高粱的土壤损失减少了80%以上,棉花的免耕减少了70%以上。在研究的八种系统中,垄作耕种的可耕性是免耕耕种的两倍多,而用小麦双季种的免耕大豆的侵蚀最少。在小流域上,带缓冲带和草地水道的传统耕作大豆的年沉积物产量最高可达约30吨/公顷,但在第一年之后,免耕大豆的年沉积量从未超过1吨/公顷。但是,仅免耕不足以控制集中流割草。大多数保护系统使径流至少减少了10%。免耕的高粱或玉米加上etch子覆盖的作物通常能最大程度地减少径流,而双季种植的小麦-小麦的径流少于常规大豆的75%。最大的减少发生在径流量较高的年份。流域的每单位面积的径流远大于可比的侵蚀图,表明将图数据外推到田间区域应仔细考虑其相对土壤和地形特征。这项研究表明,几种免耕种植系统可以将侵蚀保持在允许的范围内,减少径流,并具有经济效益。当与水道和草篱等互补的保护措施相结合时,它们为密集种植美国南部可侵蚀的高地土壤提供了实现有效保护和可持续生产的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号