...
首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASAE >EFFECTIVENESS OF VEGETATED BUFFER STRIPS IN REDUCING PESTICIDE TRANSPORT IN SIMULATED RUNOFF
【24h】

EFFECTIVENESS OF VEGETATED BUFFER STRIPS IN REDUCING PESTICIDE TRANSPORT IN SIMULATED RUNOFF

机译:植被缓冲带在模拟径流中减少农药运输的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several processes take place within vegetated buffer strips that affect their performance. To better understand these processes, a runoff study was conducted to evaluate vegetated buffer strips performance in reducing atrazine, metolachlor, and chlorpyrifos transport as affected by the drainage area to buffer strip area ratio. The simulated runoff water mixed with pesticide-treated soil was distributed onto six vegetated buffer strips, each 1.52 m wide × 20.12 m long, located downslope of the inflow distribution tank in a well established vegetated grassed waterway. These strips provided for three replications of two inflow rates designated as "drainage area/buffer strip area ratio treatments" of 15:1 and 30:1. Infiltration for the 15:1 treatment averaged 38.8% of the inflow volume, whereas it averaged 30.4% for the 30:1 treatment. Sediment retention efficiencies averaged 90.1% and 86.8% for the 15:1 and 30:1 treatments, respectively. Concentrations of atrazine and metolachlor associated with sediment outflows from the strips were larger than their respective inflow concentrations, while the results were opposite for chlorpyrifos. Concentrations in runoff water for both atrazine and metolachlor in outflow from the strips were smaller than the inflow concentrations; again, the results were opposite for chlorpyrifos. The 15:1 treatment retained an average of 52.5% of the total input of atrazine, 54.4% of metolachlor, and 83.1% of chlorpyrifos. Corresponding numbers for the 30:1 treatment were 46.8% for atrazine, 48.1% for metolachlor, and 76.9% for chlorpyrifos. Analysis of variance using the randomized block design showed that differences of percent retention of pesticide between treatments were not significant for any of the three pesticides at the 10% significance level. A lack of significant difference indicates either a need for more than three replications and/or larger area ratio treatments to be studied. The results of this study indicate that a 30:1 area ratio buffer strip could perform equally as well as a 15:1 area ratio buffer strip. Thus, less land would be required under buffer strips to get the desired results
机译:植被缓冲带中会发生一些影响其性能的过程。为了更好地理解这些过程,进行了径流研究,以评估植被缓冲带在减少阿特拉津,异丙甲草胺和毒死rif运输方面的性能,这受到排水面积与缓冲带面积比的影响。将模拟的径流水与农药处理过的土壤混合,分配到六个植被覆盖的缓冲带上,每个缓冲带长1.52 m×长20.12 m,位于一个完善的有植被的草地水道中,位于流入分配池的下坡。这些条带提供了两种进样速度的三个重复,分别称为15:1和30:1的“排水面积/缓冲带面积比处理”。 15:1处理的平均渗透量为流入量的38.8%,而30:1处理的平均渗透量为30.4%。 15:1和30:1处理的沉积物保留效率分别平均为90.1%和86.8%。与从试纸条中流出的沉淀物相关的阿特拉津和异丙甲草胺的浓度大于各自的流入浓度,而毒死rif的结果则相反。试纸条流出的at去津和异丙甲草胺的径流水中的浓度均小于流入浓度;毒死rif的结果再次相反。 15:1处理平均保留了阿特拉津总输入量的52.5%,甲草胺54.4%和毒死rif 83.1%。 30:1处理的相应数量为:阿特拉津的46.8%,甲草胺的48.1%和毒死rif的76.9%。使用随机区组设计的方差分析表明,在10%的显着性水平下,对于三种农药中的任何一种,处理之间农药保留百分率的差异均不显着。缺少显着差异表明需要研究三个以上的重复样品和/或需要进行更大面积比的处理。这项研究的结果表明,面积比为30:1的缓冲带的性能与面积比为15:1的缓冲带相同。因此,在缓冲带下需要更少的土地才能获得理想的结果

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号