首页> 外文期刊>Town and Country Planning >Five radical ideas for a better planning system
【24h】

Five radical ideas for a better planning system

机译:建立更好的计划体系的五个基本思路

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the March issue of Town & Country Planning, Tom Pain takes academics to task for their silence in debates about the philosophy of planning and for absenting themselves 'from the fight for the values of planning'. Colleagues at the Bartlett School of Planning, UCL, have been engaging in just such a discussion over the past six months about the future direction of planning. In the run-up to the general election, a group has produced a quasi-manifesto under the title Five Radical Ideas for a Better Planning System. The aim in producing the manifesto is to consider ways of responding to current problems in the system commensurate with the sweeping changes that we have witnessed over the last five years. Among these one might number the abolition of the regional tier, the under-resourced introduction of neighbourhood planning, the publication of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) as the single expression of government policy in England, and the drastic cuts in local authority budgets. We believe that central government has failed to provide a coherent and relevant planning agenda or to resource a strong planning system.
机译:在三月的《城乡规划》杂志中,汤姆·佩恩(Tom Pain)要求学者们在有关规划哲学的辩论中保持沉默,并让自己“摆脱争取规划价值的斗争”。过去六个月来,UCL巴特利特规划学院的同事一直在就规划的未来方向进行这样的讨论。在大选前夕,一个小组制定了一个准宣言,标题是“建立更好计划体系的五个根本思路”。制定宣言的目的是考虑与过去五年来我们看到的全面变化相对应的方法,以解决系统中的当前问题。其中之一可能是取消区域一级,资源贫乏的邻里规划的引入,国家规划政策框架(NPPF)的发布作为英格兰政府政策的单一表述以及地方政府预算的大幅削减。 。我们认为,中央政府未能提供连贯且相关的计划议程,也无法提供强大的计划系统。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Town and Country Planning》 |2015年第4期|164-166|共3页
  • 作者

    Yvonne Rydin;

  • 作者单位

    Bartlett School of Planning, UCL;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号