首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco control >Cigarette tax avoidance and evasion: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Project
【24h】

Cigarette tax avoidance and evasion: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Project

机译:卷烟避税和逃税:国际烟草控制政策评估(ITC)项目的调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Decades of research have produced overwhelming evidence that tobacco taxes reduce tobacco use and increase government tax revenue. The magnitude and effectiveness of taxes in reducing tobacco use provide an incentive for tobacco users, manufacturers and others, most notably criminal networks, to devise ways to avoid or evade tobacco taxes. Consequently, tobacco tax avoidance and tax evasion can reduce the public health and fiscal benefit of tobacco taxes. Objectives First, this study aims to document, using data from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project (ITC), levels and trends in cigarette users' tax avoidance and tax evasion behaviour in a sample of 16 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Second, this study explores factors associated with cigarette tax avoidance and evasion. Methods We used data from ITC surveys conducted in 16 countries to estimate the extent and type of cigarette tax avoidance/evasion between countries and across time. We used self-reported information about the source of a smoker's last purchase of cigarettes or self-reported packaging information, or similar information gathered by the interviewers during face-to-face interviews to measure tax avoidance/evasion behaviours. We used generalised estimating equations to explore individual-level factors that may affect the likelihood of cigarette tax avoidance or evasion in Canada, the USA, the UK and France. Findings We found prevalence estimates of cigarette tax avoidance/evasion vary substantially between countries and across time. In Canada, France and the UK, more than 10% of smokers reported last purchasing cigarettes from low or untaxed sources, while in Malaysia some prevalence estimates suggested substantial cigarette tax avoidance/evasion. We also found important associations between household income and education and the likelihood to engage in tax avoidance/evasion. These associations, however, varied both in direction and magnitude across countries.
机译:背景技术数十年的研究已经获得了压倒性的证据,表明烟草税减少了烟草使用并增加了政府税收。减少烟草使用的税收的数量和效力为烟草使用者,制造商和其他人,尤其是犯罪网络,提供了动机,以设计出避免或逃避烟草税的方法。因此,避免烟草税和逃税会降低烟草税的公共卫生和财政利益。目标首先,本研究旨在使用国际烟草控制政策评估项目(ITC)的数据,以16个低,中,高收入人群为样本,记录卷烟使用者避税和逃税行为的水平和趋势国家。其次,本研究探讨了与避免和避免卷烟税收有关的因素。方法我们使用了来自ITC在16个国家进行的调查得出的数据,以估算国家之间以及跨时间避免/逃税的程度和类型。我们使用了有关吸烟者最后一次吸烟的来源的自我报告信息或自我报告的包装信息,或者由访调员在面对面访谈中收集的类似信息来衡量避税/逃税行为。我们使用广义估计方程来探索可能影响加拿大,美国,英国和法国卷烟避税或逃税可能性的​​个人因素。调查结果我们发现,不同国家/地区和时间之间,对卷烟避税/逃税的普遍估计存在很大差异。在加拿大,法国和英国,超过10%的吸烟者报告最后一次从低税或无税来源购买卷烟,而在马来西亚,一些流行率估计值表明大量避免/逃避了卷烟税。我们还发现了家庭收入与教育以及从事避税/逃税可能性之间的重要关联。但是,这些协会在各国之间的方向和规模都有所不同。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Tobacco control》 |2014年第1期|13-22|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Departement d'administration de la sante, Faculte de medicine, Universite de Montreal, C.P.6128, succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, Canada H3C 3J7,Institut de recherche en sante publique de I'Universite de Montreal (IR5PUM), Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada,Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada;

    Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada;

    Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA,National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA,Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA;

    Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada,Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号