首页> 外文期刊>Time >Did She Say Too Much?
【24h】

Did She Say Too Much?

机译:她说的太多了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This much is known: On April 20, career CIA analyst Mary McCarthy was fired from her job 10 days before retirement. McCarthy admitted to having undisclosed contact with reporters, and a CIA spokesperson says, without identifying McCarthy, that the fired CIA officer also admitted disclosing classified information to the media. Sources said this includes the Washington Post's Dana Priest, who had just won a Pulitzer Prize for writing that the CIA secretly detained terrorists in Eastern Europe who hadn't been charged with a crime. Beyond that, the case gets murky. Government sources tell Time that McCarthy might have helped inform the prisons story. Through her attorney, she denies the allegation and denies that she leaked classified information about the detention program or any other topic. Although much remains unresolved, the McCarthy case has sparked heated debate, not least among current and former members of the intelligence community. Should CIA officers be fired for talking to reporters? Is leaking ever justified? And who decides? Time asked four retired career CIA officials to weigh in.
机译:众所周知:4月20日,美国中央情报局职业分析师玛丽·麦卡锡(Mary McCarthy)在退休前10天被解雇。麦卡锡承认未与记者保持联系,而中央情报局发言人表示,在未确认麦卡锡身份的情况下,被解雇的中央情报局军官也承认向媒体披露了机密信息。消息人士称,这包括《华盛顿邮报》的达娜·普里斯特(Dana Priest),他刚刚获得普利策奖,其著作是中央情报局秘密拘留了没有被指控犯罪的东欧恐怖分子。除此之外,案件变得模糊。政府消息人士告诉《时代》杂志,麦卡锡可能有助于告知监狱故事。她通过律师否认了这一指控,并否认她泄露了有关拘留计划或任何其他主题的机密信息。尽管仍有许多悬而未决的问题,但麦卡锡案引发了激烈的辩论,尤其是在情报界的现任和前任成员中。中情局官员是否应因与记者谈话而被解雇?泄漏是合理的吗?谁来决定?时间要求中央情报局的四名退休职业人士参与进来。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Time》 |2006年第19期|p.37-38|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 连续出版物;政治、法律;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:46:09
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号