...
首页> 外文期刊>Thunderbird International Business Review >Risky Business:Financial-Sector Liberalization and China
【24h】

Risky Business:Financial-Sector Liberalization and China

机译:风险业务:金融部门自由化与中国

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

China's dramatic growth in exports, its rising conflict with its trade partners over the perceived undervaluation of the renminbi, and the snail's pace of financial liberalization is pushing its bilateral trade and monetary relations to a boil. Discontent in the United States, Japan, Southeast Asia, and, most recently, Brazil, has led popular pundits and even country finance ministers to speak publicly of a "currency war" with many calling for the de-pegging of the renminbi to the dollar and an immediate appreciation of China's currency. However, China's history of liberalization, beginning with the opening to the West in 1978, is well known as one of gradualism in trade and the financial spheres. Economic history is replete with economic crises brought on by too rapid or premature liberalization of countries' capital flows. This article presents the case both for and against capital account liberalization and highlights the risks that China in particular confronts in responding to external demands for greater openness and an appreciation of the renminbi. It clearly captures the tightrope that China must walk between responding to the demands of its trade partners and maintaining economic growth and political stability at home.
机译:中国出口的急剧增长,由于人们认为人民币被低估而与贸易伙伴之间的冲突不断加剧,蜗牛的金融自由化步伐使双边贸易和货币关系陷入困境。在美国,日本,东南亚,以及最近的巴西,人们的不满导致大众专家甚至国家财政部长公开谈论“货币战争”,许多人呼吁人民币与美元脱钩。并立即使人民币升值。但是,中国的自由化历史始于1978年向西方开放,是众所周知的贸易和金融领域的渐进主义之一。经济历史充斥着因国家资本流动的过快或过早开放而带来的经济危机。本文介绍了支持和反对资本账户自由化的案例,并强调了中国尤其是在应对对外开放和人民币升值的外部需求方面面临的风险。它清楚地抓住了中国必须走钢丝,既要回应贸易伙伴的要求,又要保持国内经济增长和政治稳定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号