首页> 外文期刊>Thermal engineering >Comparative Analysis of Cooling Systems for Energy Equipment of Combined Heat and Power Plants and Nuclear Power Plants
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Cooling Systems for Energy Equipment of Combined Heat and Power Plants and Nuclear Power Plants

机译:热电厂与核电厂能源设备冷却系统的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the 20th century, the thermal power engineering in this country was oriented toward once-through cooling systems. More than 50% of the CHPP and NPP capacities with once-through cooling systems put into operation before the 1990s were large-scale water consumers but with minimum irretrievable water consumption. In 1995, the Water Code of the Russian Federation was adopted in which restrictions on application of once-through cooling systems for newly designed combined heat and power plants (CHPPs) were introduced for the first time. A ban on application of once-through systems was imposed by the current Water Code of the Russian Federation (Federal law no. 74-FZ, Art. 60 Cl. 4) not only for new CHPPs but also for those to be modified. Clause 4 of Article 60 of the Water Code of the Russian Federation contravenes law no. 7-FZ "On Protection of the Environment" that has priority significance, since the water environment is only part of the natural environment and those articles of the Water Code of the Russian Federation that are related directly to electric power engineering, viz., Articles 46 and 62. In recent decades, the search for means to increase revenue charges and the economic pressure on the thermal power industry caused introduction by law of charges for use of water by cooling systems irrespective of the latter's impact on the water quality pf the source, the environment, the economic efficiency of the power production, and the living conditions of the people. The long-range annual increase in the water use charges forces the power generating companies to switch transfer once-through service water supply installations to recirculating water supply systems and once-through-recirculating systems with multiple reuse of warm water, which drastically reduces the technical, economic, and ecological characteristic of the power plant operation and also results in increasing power rates for the population. This work comprehensively substantiates the demands of power engineering specialists that the ban on development and construction of once-through service water supply systems should be lifted and the proposals for new parameters, e.g., temperature and back pressure, for designing low-potential equipment of steam-gas and steam-power plants.
机译:在20世纪,该国的火电工程面向一次性冷却系统。在1990年代之前投入运行的直通式冷却系统中,超过50%的CHPP和NPP能力是大规模的用水户,但不可回收的用水量却最小。 1995年,俄罗斯联邦通过了《水法》,其中首次引入了对新设计的热电厂联合使用直通式冷却系统的限制。俄罗斯联邦现行水法(联邦法律第74-FZ号,第60条第4款)规定,不仅对新的CHPP,而且对要修改的CHPP,都禁止使用一次性使用的系统。俄罗斯联邦《水法》第60条第4款违反了第1号法律。具有优先意义的7-FZ“关于环境保护”,因为水环境仅是自然环境的一部分,并且《俄罗斯联邦水法》的条款与电力工程直接相关,即条款46和62.在最近几十年中,寻求增加收入费用的手段以及对火电行业的经济压力,导致法律对冷却系统用水的收费提出了要求,而不论冷却系统对水源对水质的影响如何。 ,环境,电力生产的经济效率以及人民的生活条件。长期每年用水费的增加迫使发电公司将一次性直通式服务供水装置切换为循环供水系统和多次重复使用热水的直通式循环系统,这大大降低了技术电厂运行的经济,生态和生态特性,还导致居民的电费增加。这项工作全面证实了电力工程专家的要求,即应取消对直通式服务供水系统的开发和建设的禁令,并提出有关设计低电势蒸汽设备的新参数(例如温度和背压)的建议-天然气和蒸汽发电厂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号