首页> 外文期刊>Theory and Society >Wildcats in banking fields: the politics of financial inclusion
【24h】

Wildcats in banking fields: the politics of financial inclusion

机译:银行领域的野猫:金融普惠政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Rightwing theorists argue that we owe the current financial crisis to the democratization of credit, or financial inclusion: politics interfered with the market to benefit marginalized actors, only to cause instability and risk. Leftwing theorists focus instead on financialization: namely, the shift of profit-making activities from industry to finance. These views implicitly draw on Schumpeter and Marx. Much like their intellectual progenitors, they emphasize exogenous processes to explain financial change. Here I claim that the connection between financial innovation and financial inclusion is endogenous. I suggest two main typologies of financial innovators: Market Utopians (MUs) and Populist Innovators (PIs). Financial inclusion, I submit, is the byproduct of the quest for power of the latter.
机译:右翼理论家认为,我们将当前的金融危机归因于信贷的民主化或金融包容性:政治干预了市场,使边缘化的参与者受益,只会造成不稳定和风险。左翼理论家则将注意力集中在金融化上:即,将获利活动从工业转移到金融上。这些观点暗含了熊彼特和马克思。就像他们的智力祖先一样,他们强调解释财务变化的外生过程。在这里,我声称金融创新与金融包容性之间的联系是内生的。我建议金融创新者有两种主要类型:市场空想主义者(MU)和民粹主义创新者(PI)。我认为,金融包容性是寻求后者的权力的副产品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号