首页> 外文期刊>Theory and Decision >REDUCTION, SUPERVENIENCE, AND THE AUTONOMY OF SOCIAL SCIENTIFIC LAWS
【24h】

REDUCTION, SUPERVENIENCE, AND THE AUTONOMY OF SOCIAL SCIENTIFIC LAWS

机译:归约,监督与社会科学法自治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many have felt that it is impossible to defend autonomous laws of social science: where the regularities upheld are law-like it is argued that they are not at base social scientific, and where the phenomena to be explained would seem to require social descriptions, it is argued that laws governing the phenomena are unavailable at that level. But is it possible to develop an ontology that supports the dependence of the social on the physical, while nonetheless supporting the ex- planatory power of genuinely autonomous social scientific laws?
机译:许多人认为,不可能捍卫社会科学的自治法则:坚持规律性就像法律一样,有人认为它们不是社会科学的基础,而要解释的现象似乎需要社会描述,这是不可能的。有人认为,在该级别上尚无管辖该现象的法律。但是,是否有可能发展一种本体论,以支持社会对物质的依赖,同时又支持真正自主的社会科学法则的解释力?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号