...
首页> 外文期刊>Theory of computing systems >Comments on Arithmetic Complexity, Kleene Closure, and Formal Power Series
【24h】

Comments on Arithmetic Complexity, Kleene Closure, and Formal Power Series

机译:关于算术复杂性,Kleene闭包和形式幂级数的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In reference to our earlier work [1], Pierre McKenzie and Sambuddha Roy pointed out that the proofs of statements (b) and (c) in Theorem 7.3 are buggy. The main flaw is that the identity e of the group F may not be the identity of the monoid, and so the claim that w ∈ (A_(F,r))~* (↔)w is not an element of $. Test does not work. Herewith, we show: 1. With a slight change to Definition 7.1, the statement of Theorem 7.3 holds unchanged. In our opinion, this is the most interesting way to correct the error in the original paper. We present a complete proof below. For completeness, we also mention another way to correct the error: 2. Leaving Definition 7.1 unchanged, a weaker version of Theorem 7.3 holds (with only minor adjustments to the proof given in the paper).
机译:关于我们以前的工作[1],Pierre McKenzie和Sambuddha Roy指出定理7.3中陈述(b)和(c)的证明是错误的。主要缺陷在于,组F的标识e可能不是类半身像的标识,因此w∈(A_(F,r))〜*(↔)w的主张不是$的元素。测试不起作用。因此,我们显示:1.对定义7.1稍作更改,定理7.3的陈述保持不变。我们认为,这是纠正原始论文中最错误的方法。我们在下面提供完整的证明。为了完整起见,我们还提到了另一种纠正错误的方法:2.保持定义7.1不变,较弱版本的定理7.3成立(仅对本文给出的证明进行了细微调整)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Theory of computing systems》 |2013年第3期|503-506|共4页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA;

    The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, C.I.T. Campus, Chennai 600113, India;

    The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, C.I.T. Campus, Chennai 600113, India;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号