首页> 外文期刊>Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science >Closing Pandora's Box: adapting a systems ergonomics methodology for better understanding the ecological complexity underpinning the development and prevention of running-related injury
【24h】

Closing Pandora's Box: adapting a systems ergonomics methodology for better understanding the ecological complexity underpinning the development and prevention of running-related injury

机译:关闭潘多拉魔盒:采用人机工程学方法学,以更好地理解生态复杂性,这是发展和预防跑步相关伤害的基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The popularity of running as a form of exercise continues to increaserndramatically worldwide. Alongside this participation growth is thernburden of running-related injury (RRI). Over the past four decades,rntraditional scientific research applications have primarily attemptedrnto isolate discrete risk factors for RRI using observational studyrndesigns as commonly used in public health epidemiology.rnUnfortunately, only very few randomised controlled trials havernevaluated the efficacy associated with a well-specified RRIrnprevention intervention. Even though the knowledge about riskrnfactors as generated in observational studies is valuable for betterrnunderstanding why RRI develops, it nonetheless means that therernremains a major knowledge gap about how best to prevent it,rnespecially in a way that fully addresses all causal factors. Alongsidernthe continuing use of traditional scientific approaches, a particularrnsystems ergonomics methodology should also be considered inrnlight of its potential to visualise the complete distance runningrnsystem. This article adapts the Systems Theoretic Accident Mappingrnand Processes (STAMP) model to the RRI research preventionrncontext. The direct application of STAMP might offer newrnknowledge about how to prevent RRI, such as exposing questionsrnaround the feasibility of adopting novel injury preventionrninterventions that do not directly target runners themselves.
机译:在全世界范围内,跑步作为一种锻炼形式的流行性持续增加。除了这种参与之外,还增加了跑步相关伤害(RRI)的负担。在过去的四十年中,传统的科研应用主要尝试使用公共卫生流行病学中常用的观察性研究设计来分离RRI的离散风险因素。不幸的是,只有极少数的随机对照试验评估了与RRI预防措施明确相关的功效。尽管观察性研究中产生的有关风险因素的知识对于更好地理解RRI的形成原因是有价值的,但是这意味着仍然存在关于如何最好地预防它的主要知识缺口,特别是在充分解决所有因果关系方面。在继续使用传统科学方法的同时,还应考虑到特定系统的人机工程学方法学的潜力,以使其可视化完整的长距离跑步系统。本文将系统理论事故映射和过程(STAMP)模型适应RRI研究的预防背景。 STAMP的直接应用可能会提供有关如何预防RRI的新知识,例如,提出关于采用不直接针对运动员本身的新型伤害预防干预措施的可行性的疑问。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science》 |2017年第4期|338-359|共22页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Human Movement and Sports Science, Australian Centre for Research into Injury in Sportsand its Prevention (ACRISP), Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Australia;

    Centre for Human Factorsand Sociotechnical Systems, Faculty of Arts, Business and Law, University of the Sunshine Coast, SunshineCoast, Australia;

    Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark;

    Centre for Human Factorsand Sociotechnical Systems, Faculty of Arts, Business and Law, University of the Sunshine Coast, SunshineCoast, Australia;

    Department of Human Movement and Sports Science, Australian Centre for Research into Injury in Sportsand its Prevention (ACRISP), Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Systems ergonomics; epidemiology; runningrninjury; STAMP; systems complexity; injuryrnepidemiology; injury prevention;

    机译:系统人体工程学;流行病学跑步受伤;邮票;系统复杂度;伤害流行病学;伤害预防;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:40:12

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号