...
首页> 外文期刊>The Political Quarterly >Bad Piano? Bad Music? A Response to Comments on Lowe and Pemberton, The Official History of the British Civil Service, Volume Ⅱ: 1982-1997
【24h】

Bad Piano? Bad Music? A Response to Comments on Lowe and Pemberton, The Official History of the British Civil Service, Volume Ⅱ: 1982-1997

机译:坏钢琴? 糟糕的音乐? 回应对Lowe和Pemberton的评论,英国公务员的官方历史,股票股份二:1982-1997

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The reforms made to the civil service during the premierships of Margaret Thatcher and John Major were unparalleled in scope in peacetime. Undertaken in the name of efficiency and better management, they served to Balkanise the service, shrink the number of civil servants, subordinate them to the will of ministers, and effectively privatise a swathe of public services. Their legacy, however, was a relatively weak centre struggling to cope with a fragmented and extremely complex governmental machine, an overly managerialist senior civil service sometimes side-lined from policy making, and a system lacking slack as a consequence of the quest for 'efficiency' and dependent on private contractors of sometimes dubious worth. Over the past five years that legacy left the country poorly placed to triumph over the challenges of Brexit and then of Covid-19.
机译:在玛格丽特·撒切尔和约翰专业的英超官员中对公务员的改革在和平时期是无与伦比的。 他们以效率和更好的管理人员进行,他们为违法服务,缩小公务员人数,从属于部长遗嘱,并有效地私有化公共服务。 然而,他们的遗产是一个相对薄弱的中心,以应对一个分散和极其复杂的政府机器,一个过于管理的高级公务员,有时会从政策制定中侧面排队,并且由于寻求'效率而缺乏松弛的系统 '并依赖有时候值得怀疑的私人承包商。 在过去的五年中,遗产使这个国家对Brexit的挑战胜利,而且在Covid-19的挑战中胜利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号