...
首页> 外文期刊>The Political Quarterly >The Recall of MPs Act 2015: Petitions, Polls and Problems
【24h】

The Recall of MPs Act 2015: Petitions, Polls and Problems

机译:回收《 2015年国会议员法》:请愿,民意调查和问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Under the terms of the Recall of MPs Act 2015, there have been three recall petitions brought against MPs who have committed misconduct. The outcomes have been variable. The first petition failed to attract enough signatures to trigger a by-election. The second led to the unseating of the MP, who declined the opportunity to stand in the subsequent by-election. The third led to the removal of the MP and an unsuccessful candidature to regain his seat at the by-election. Variation has not been confined to outcomes. There have been differences in how the legislation has been implemented—in terms of the ease of access of constituents to the recall petition. This article suggests that in the interests of fairness and transparency, there is a strong case for adjusting the legislation to ensure national standardisation of local implementation.
机译:根据《 2015年国会议员召回法案》的条款,针对犯有不当行为的国会议员提出了三项召回请愿书。结果是可变的。第一次请愿书没有吸引足够的签名来触发补选。第二件事导致国会议员的落选,国会议员拒绝参加随后的补选的机会。第三次导致国会议员的罢免,以及未能通过补选重新当选议员的候选人。变化不仅仅局限于结果。立法的实施方式存在差异,就三方成员获得罢免申请的便利性而言。本文建议,出于公平和透明的考虑,有充分的理由调整立法以确保国家对地方实施的标准化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号