首页> 外文期刊>The police chief >Liability for Special or Private Police Officers
【24h】

Liability for Special or Private Police Officers

机译:特别警察或私人警察的责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Municipalities or state governments may mistakenly believe that they can avoid all liability claims when they privatize some law enforcement or corrections functions. Even by simply granting police powers to private citizens or by allowing regular officers to work for third parties, it is possible that traditional §1983 (the Federal Civil Rights Act) or similar claims may be brought against both the individuals and the governmental appointing authority. Unfortunately, there is no "one-size-fits-all" bright line rule that determines when civil rights or other liability claims may succeed, nor when such private or off-duty officers may assert a qualified immunity defense. Courts have made it clear that determinations wil be made on a case-by-case basis, with facts controlling the outcome.
机译:市政当局或州政府可能错误地认为,将某些执法或惩戒职能私有化时,它们可以避免所有责任索赔。即使只是简单地向私人公民授予警察权力或允许正式官员为第三方工作,也有可能对个人和政府指定机构提出传统的§1983(《联邦民权法》)或类似要求。不幸的是,没有“一刀切”的明晰规则来确定民权或其他责任主张何时可以成功,或者这种私人或下班官员何时可以主张合格的豁免权辩护。法院已经明确表示,将根据具体情况进行裁决,并以事实控制结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号