【24h】

Editorial

机译:社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As was recently demonstrated by a recent court case where a young woman sustained life-changing injuries when she walked into a bollard (Hidden consequences, p8), it is vital that public spaces are adequately lit. That is a function of good exterior lighting - that people can safely and securely navigate the streets at night. However, in an increasingly litigious culture, there is a danger in lighting as in other fields that overengineering and overcompensation creeps in. Someone recently expressed the opinion that the award-winning scheme for King's Cross Square was 'too dark' from this point of view, despite the fact that people are flocking to and lingering in what is a very carefully considered and pleasantly lit space (which also met some very stringent criteria). Legal considerations should clearly inform schemes, but fear of litigation should not drive lighting design. The human race has managed to evolve to this stage of its development without, for the most part, black and yellow sticky tape on every potential hazard. Overlighting and excessive uniformity equally despoil the environment.
机译:正如最近发生的一起法院案件所证明的那样,一名年轻女子走进系柱时遭受了改变生命的伤害(Hidden后果,第8页),公共场所的充足照明至关重要。这是良好的外部照明的功能-人们可以在夜间安全,可靠地在街道上行驶。然而,在一种日益诉讼化的文化中,照明存在着其他领域过度工程和过度补偿的危险。最近有人表示,从这个角度来看,国王十字广场的获奖方案“太暗了”。 ,尽管人们蜂拥而至并徘徊在一个经过仔细考虑并且光线充足的空间(也符合一些非常严格的标准)中。法律上的考虑应该清楚地告诉方案,但是对诉讼的恐惧不应驱动照明设计。人类已经成功地发展到了这个发展阶段,在大多数情况下,每种潜在危害都没有黑色和黄色胶带。过度采光和过分均匀会破坏环境。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Lighting Journal》 |2015年第4期|A1-A1|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:02:59

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号