首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Navigation >Performance Comparison between the Multi-Colony and Multi-Pheromone ACO Algorithms for Solving the Multi-objective Routing Problem in a Public Transportation Network
【24h】

Performance Comparison between the Multi-Colony and Multi-Pheromone ACO Algorithms for Solving the Multi-objective Routing Problem in a Public Transportation Network

机译:公交网络中多目标和多信息素ACO算法解决多目标路由问题的性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Routing in a multimodal urban public transportation network, according to the user's preferences, can be considered as a multi-objective optimisation problem. Solving this problem is a complicated task due to the different and incompatible objective functions, various modes in the network, and the large size of the network. In this research, two optimisation algorithms are considered for solving this problem. The multi-colony and multi-pheromone Ant Colony Optimisation (ACO) algorithms are two different modes of the Multi-Objective ACO (MOACO) algorithm. Moreover, according to the acquired information, the algorithms implemented in the public transportation network of Tehran consist of four modes. In addition, three objective functions have been simultaneously considered as the problem's objectives. The algorithms are run with different initial parameters and afterwards, the results are compared and evaluated based on the different obtained routes and with the aid of the convergence and repeatability tests, diversity and convergence metrics.
机译:根据用户的喜好,在多式联运城市公共交通网络中进行路线选择可被视为多目标优化问题。由于目标函数的不同和不兼容,网络中的各种模式以及网络的规模大,解决此问题是一项复杂的任务。在这项研究中,考虑了两种优化算法来解决该问题。多殖民地和多信息素蚁群优化(ACO)算法是多目标ACO(MOACO)算法的两种不同模式。此外,根据获取的信息,在德黑兰公共交通网络中实现的算法包括四种模式。此外,三个目标函数已同时被视为问题的目标。该算法以不同的初始参数运行,然后,根据获得的不同路径并借助收敛性和可重复性测试,多样性和收敛性指标,对结果进行比较和评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号