首页> 外文期刊>The Gerontologist >The Effect of Licensure Type on the Policies, Practices, and Resident Composition of Florida Assisted Living Facilities
【24h】

The Effect of Licensure Type on the Policies, Practices, and Resident Composition of Florida Assisted Living Facilities

机译:许可类型对佛罗里达州辅助生活设施的政策,实践和居民组成的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Most assisted living facility (ALF) residents are White widows in their mid- to late 80s who need assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) because of frailty or cognitive decline. Yet, ALFs also serve younger individuals with physical disabilities, traumatic brain injury, or serious mental illness. We compare Florida ALFs with different licensure profiles by admission-discharge policies and resident population characteristics. Design and Methods: We use state administrative data and facility survey data from the Florida Study of Assisted Living (FSAL) to classify ALFs by licensure type and to determine how licensure influences ALF policies, practices, and resident population profiles. Results: Standard-licensed traditional ALFs primarily serve elderly White women with physical care needs and typically retain residents when their physical health deteriorates. Some ALFs that hold specialty licenses (extended congregate care and limited nursing services) offer extra physical care services and serve an older, more physically frail population with greater physical and cognitive challenges. ALFs with limited mental health (LMH) licenses serve clientele who are more racially and ethnically diverse, younger, and more likely to be men and single. LMH facilities also have a significant proportion of frail elder residents who live alongside these younger residents, including some who exhibit behavioral problems. LMH facilities also employ discharge policies that make it more difficult for frail elderly residents to age in place. Implications: These differences by facility type raise important quality of life issues for both the frail elderly individuals and assisted living residents who do not fit the conventional demographic profile. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:目的:大多数辅助生活设施(ALF)居民是80年代中期至后期的白人寡妇,由于脆弱或认知能力下降,需要协助进行日常生活活动(ADL)。但是,ALF还可以为身体残障,脑外伤或严重精神疾病的年轻人提供服务。通过入院-出院政策和居民人口特征,我们比较了佛罗里达州ALF的不同执照状况。设计和方法:我们使用佛罗里达州辅助生活研究(FSAL)的州行政数据和设施调查数据按许可类型对ALF进行分类,并确定许可如何影响ALF政策,实践和居民人口概况。结果:获得标准许可的传统ALF主要为有身体护理需求的老年白人妇女提供服务,并且通常在身体健康状况恶化时留住居民。一些拥有特殊执照的ALF(扩展的整体护理和有限的护理服务)提供额外的身体护理服务,并为年龄更大,身体更虚弱的人群提供更大的身体和认知挑战。精神健康(LMH)许可证有限的ALF为客户提供服务,这些客户在种族和种族上更加多样化,年轻,并且更有可能是男性和单身。 LMH设施中还有相当一部分体弱的年老居民与这些年轻居民并肩生活,其中包括一些表现出问题的人。 LMH设施还采用排放政策,这使体弱的老年居民更难以就位。含义:这些设施类型的差异为体弱的老年人和不符合常规人口统计特征的生活辅助者带来了重要的生活质量问题。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Gerontologist》 |2009年第2期|p.211-223|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Debra Street, PhD,1,2 Stephanie Burge, PhD,3 and Jill Quadagno, PhD41Address correspondence to Debra Street, PhD, Department of Sociology, State University of New York at Buffalo, 430 Park Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260. E-mail: dastreet@buffalo.edu2Department of Sociology, State University of New York at Buffalo.3Department of Sociology, University of Oklahoma, Norman.4Department of Sociology, Pepper Institute on Aging and Public Policy, Florida State University, Tallahassee.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号