首页> 外文期刊>The Engineer >Return to the Moon may help earthlings
【24h】

Return to the Moon may help earthlings

机译:回到月球可能有助于地球

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Should humans return to the Moon? The arguments against are reasonably strong.The Moon has already been visited and nothing found there detained the visitors. Interesting lunar science could be done by people on the Moon, but much the same science could also be done by robots - and the world is full of interesting science that doesn't get done, because the world is almost infinitely interesting. Its wonders leave science spoilt for choice; as long as the science that gets chosen is good stuff, there's little point in worrying about the equally good stuff that doesn't.Some claim that a return to the Moon will bring real, and possibly large, economic benefits. You should take that with a pinch of salt (one of many necessities with which the Moon is woefully under-stocked). There may be some valuable platinum-group metals there - but unless they can be exploited on a large enough scale to change the way the economy uses such things, driving up demand even fasterthan costs drop, they don't took like a good prospect. Helium-3, which makes up a few parts per billion of the lunar regolith, has its boosters; but it is a fuel for a sort of fusion reactor no one has ever built, and which it is quite possible no one ever will build.
机译:人类应该回到月球吗?反对的论点是合理强大的。月亮已经被访问,没有发现拘留了访客。有趣的月球科学可以由月球上的人们所做的,但是同样的科学也可以通过机器人来完成 - 世界上充满了有趣的科学,没有完成,因为世界几乎无限的兴趣。它的奇迹留下科学被宠坏了;只要被选中的科学是好东西,就担心同样好的东西就没有。有些人声称,回归月亮将带来真实的,可能是大的经济效益。你应该用少量盐(月亮萎靡不足的许多必需品之一)。那里可能有一些有价值的铂金群金属 - 但除非他们可以在足够大的规模上被开发来改变经济使用这些东西的方式,甚至更加伟大的花费降低的需求,他们不像一个良好的前景。 Helium-3,它占几十亿百左右的月球促象,具有助推器;但这是一种融合的融合反应堆,没有人建造,哪种融合是迄今为止,没有人会建造。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Engineer》 |2019年第7909期|16-16|共1页
  • 作者

    Oliver Morton;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号