首页> 外文期刊>The ENDS report >1970s Britain Its air is choked, rivers filthy, beaches slick with sewage Acid rain falls Since then, EU regulations have driven green progress But Brexit means our future lies outside the bloc Will Britain become 'the dirty man of Europe' once again?
【24h】

1970s Britain Its air is choked, rivers filthy, beaches slick with sewage Acid rain falls Since then, EU regulations have driven green progress But Brexit means our future lies outside the bloc Will Britain become 'the dirty man of Europe' once again?

机译:20世纪70年代英国它的空气被窒息,河流肮脏,海滩与污水酸雨瀑布从那时起,欧盟规定已经推动了绿色进展,但布雷克特意味着我们未来的谎言谎言,英国再次成为“欧洲肮脏的人”一次?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The UK government has an ambition to "leave our environment in a better state than we found it". But can it be trusted to do so? It is a question that cuts to the heart of a four-year debate about UK environmental protection and regulation as intimate ties with the EU are cut. However, whatever happens in the last throes of negotiations, 31 December is not the end game. In some ways it is the starting gun for what Nick Molho, executive director of the Aldersgate Group, refers to as the "nitty gritty". The Environment Bill is of course the centrepiece of post-Brexit green regulation, coming with a new Office for Environmental Protection (OEP), as well as long-term targets. It has a completely new regulatory architecture built into it and as such could be "world leading". So, will our flora and fauna flourish and our waterways run pure? Will our chemicals be cleaned up and the air in our cities cleansed? Will we lead the UN COP26 climate talks in Scotland with powerful carbon-pricing policies? Listen to ministers and the answer to all of the above is yes. It is a romantic notion. EU laws have pushed the UK to better protect the environment but the regime is far from perfect, as recent status reports from the European Environment Agency show. "It's a bleak picture," says Martin Baxter, chief policy adviser at IEMA. "You could absolutely argue it could be worse," but "trying to get [28] countries on the same page is more challenging than one. The UK can be more agile."
机译:英国政府有野心“让我们的环境留在更好的州,而不是我们找到它”。但它可以值得信任吗?这是一个关于英国环境保护和监管的四年辩论的核心问题,因为与欧盟的亲密关系被削减。然而,无论在最后一个谈判的谈判中发生什么,12月31日不是结束游戏。在某种程度上,它是Aldersgate集团的执行董事的尼克莫罗的起始枪,指的是“Nitty GriTy”。环境法案当然是Brexit后绿色监管的核心,与新的环保办公室(OEP)以及长期目标。它拥有完全新的监管体系结构,因此可能是“世界领先”。那么,我们的植物群和动物群会蓬勃发展,我们的水道运行纯净吗?我们的化学品将被清理干净,我们城市的空气清洁吗?我们将在苏格兰领导联合国COP26气候谈判强大的碳定价政策吗?听取部长,以上所有的答案是肯定的。这是一个浪漫的概念。欧盟法律推动了英国更好地保护环境,但政权远非完美,因为欧洲环境机构展的最近的地位报告。 “IEMA的首席政策顾问Martin Baxter说:”这是一个凄凉的照片。 “你绝对可能是可能更糟糕的,”但是“试图在同一页面上得到[28]国家比一个更具挑战性。英国可以更加敏捷。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《The ENDS report》 |2020年第549期|16-23|共8页
  • 作者

    David Burrow;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 21:50:28
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号