...
首页> 外文期刊>The Classical Quarterly >CONTROLLING TRAVEL: DEPORTATION, ISLANDS AND THE REGULATION OF SENATORIAL MOBILITY IN THE AUGUSTAN PRINCIPATE
【24h】

CONTROLLING TRAVEL: DEPORTATION, ISLANDS AND THE REGULATION OF SENATORIAL MOBILITY IN THE AUGUSTAN PRINCIPATE

机译:控制旅行:奥古斯丁公主的出境,离岛和参议员调动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In her recent article in this journal, Sarah T. Cohen argued that the Roman practicenof deportatio ad insulam – the punishment of exile to an island so commonly foundnin Roman law from the Imperial Era – had as its genesis Augustus’ banishment ofnhis daughter Julia to the island of Pandateria (and a number of her lovers to othernislands) in 2 B.C.1 According to Cohen, Augustus created island exile specificallynto deal with the crisis caused by Julia’s misbehaviour, and his action subsequentlyncreated an entirely new type of punishment in Roman law. While Cohen is certainlyncorrect that Julia’s banishment is a critical milestone in the development of islandnexile, there are several reasons to believe that Augustus’ thinking on the nature andnpurpose of exile had already begun evolving long before he sent Julia to Pandateria.nAlthough no judicial sentence of island exile is attested before 2 B.C.,2 the ideasnunderlying deportatio ad insulam derived more fundamentally from an earlier andnbroader imperial policy – the regulation of elite travel. From the earliest years ofnhis rule Augustus sought to control the physical location and movement of Rome’snaristocracy as a means of consolidating his control over the empire, and the developmentnof deportatio ad insulam should be seen as an extension of this practice.nIndeed, the regulation of elite travel and island exile must be studied as corollarynpractices, since each one sheds light on the other. Historians who have previouslynstudied exile under Augustus (including Cohen) tend to treat the subject as annisolated or independent aspect of Roman law, and therefore have been concernednpredominantly with the legal and administrative aspects of its development. Thisnpaper will take the opposite approach and will examine island exile as part of anlarger and more comprehensive Augustan policy. While Augustus had the raw powernnecessary to subdue any potential rival, he preferred to avoid such open use ofnforce by instead limiting the aristocracy’s ability to organize and mobilize resistancenagainst him. The regulation of elite travel – including that of those members ofnthe elite in exile – enabled Augustus to use geography instead of military force
机译:莎拉·T·科恩(Sarah T. Cohen)在她本刊的最新文章中指出,罗马人对宗教的驱逐行为-对流放到帝国时代普遍存在的罗马法中的一个岛的惩罚-是奥古斯都将其女儿朱莉娅(Julia)驱逐到罗马的起源。公元前1年1月,Pandateria岛(以及她的许多恋人到异国他乡)根据科恩的说法,奥古斯都专门创建了流放岛来应对朱莉娅行为不当造成的危机,他的举动随后在罗马法中创造了一种全新的惩罚方式。虽然科恩肯定朱莉娅的流放是岛上移民发展的关键里程碑是不正确的,但是有很多理由认为,奥古斯都对流放的性质和目的的思考早在他把朱莉亚送到潘达特里亚之前就已经开始发展。岛上的流放者在公元前2年得到了证明2,其背后的思想基础是从较早的,更广泛的帝国政策–精英旅行的规制中更根本地吸取了印度的交通。从奥古斯都统治初期开始,奥古斯都就试图控制罗马贵族的实际位置和活动,以巩固他对帝国的控制权,而驱逐胰岛素的发展则应被视为这种做法的延伸。必须将精英旅行和流放岛屿的行为作为必然的方法进行研究,因为每个人都能相互了解。以前曾研究过奥古斯都流放史的历史学家(包括科恩)倾向于将其视为罗马法的独立或独立方面,因此主要关注其发展的法律和行政方面。本白皮书将采取相反的方法,并将作为更广泛,更全面的奥古斯都政策的一部分,研究岛屿流放问题。尽管奥古斯都拥有征服任何潜在竞争对手的原始权力,但他宁愿避免这种公开使用武力,而要限制贵族组织对抗他的组织和动员力量的能力。对精英旅行的规定(包括流亡精英人士的规定)使奥古斯都能够使用地理而不是军事力量

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Classical Quarterly》 |2011年第1期|p.230-266|共37页
  • 作者

    FRED K. DROGULA;

  • 作者单位

    Providence College, Providence,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号