首页> 外文期刊>The army lawyer >Unleashing the Dogs of War: Using Military Working Dogs to Apprehend Enemy Combatants
【24h】

Unleashing the Dogs of War: Using Military Working Dogs to Apprehend Enemy Combatants

机译:释放战犬:使用军用工作犬逮捕敌方战斗人员

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the El Anbar province of central Iraq, an infantry company conducts a mission rehearsal in preparation for a cordon and search operation to capture an enemy insurgent leader. The operation will be conducted in a densely populated neighborhood within the city limits of Ar Ramadi. The company commander planning the operation is concerned about what actions can be taken if the insurgent leader attempts to escape capture. The Rules of Engagement (ROE) authorize the use of force, including deadly force, to be used against the targeted insurgent leader. However, if the insurgent leader successfully avoids capture, or is shot dead while trying to escape, the commander may lose an invaluable opportunity to gather battlefield intelligence against the insurgency. The company commander is also concerned about the risks of controlling lethal fires in a populated urban area. To mitigate the risks of collateral damage and civilian casualties, the company commander submits a request to employ a non-lethal weapon for use during the capture mission. Back at the brigade command post, the company commander's request to use a non-lethal weapon during the cordon and search operation is forwarded from the battalion commander to the brigade commander. The brigade commander has never received a request to deploy a non-lethal weapon in an offensive operation and contemplates the ramifications of granting his subordinate commander's request. The brigade commander recognizes that the requested "non-lethal weapon " has never been used against the enemy during offensive combat operations. After studying the request for several minutes, the brigade commander turns to his Command Judge Advocate (CJA) and asks, "Judge, can we use a dog to apprehend enemy combatants during a cordon and search operation?"
机译:在伊拉克中部的埃尔安巴尔省,一家步兵公司进行了演练,以准备进行警戒和搜索行动,以俘虏敌军叛乱的头目。该手术将在Ar Ramadi市区内人口稠密的社区中进行。计划行动的连长担心,如果叛乱领导人试图逃脱捕获,该采取什么行动。交战规则(ROE)授权对目标叛乱领导人使用武力,包括致命武力。但是,如果叛乱领导人成功地避免了俘虏,或者在试图逃脱时被击dead,那么指挥官可能会失去宝贵的机会,来收集抵抗叛乱的战场情报。连长也担心在人口稠密的城市地区控制致命火灾的风险。为了减轻附带损害和平民伤亡的风险,连长要求在捕获任务期间使用非致命武器的要求。回到大队指挥所后,连长在封锁和搜查行动中使用非致命武器的要求从大队指挥官转交给了大队指挥官。旅指挥官从未收到过在进攻性行动中部署非致命武器的请求,并考虑了准许其下属指挥官请求的后果。旅指挥官意识到在进攻性战斗行动中从未使用过所要求的“非致命武器”来对付敌人。在研究了请求数分钟后,该旅指挥官求助于其首席审判官(CJA),并问:“法官,我们可以在警戒线和搜查行动中用狗抓捕敌方战斗机吗?”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号