首页> 外文期刊>The army lawyer >The Use of Government-Owned Vehicles for the Comfort or Health and Welfare of Personnel in Deployed or Remote Locations
【24h】

The Use of Government-Owned Vehicles for the Comfort or Health and Welfare of Personnel in Deployed or Remote Locations

机译:在部署或偏远地区使用政府拥有的车辆改善人员的舒适或健康和福祉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

My interest in the topic of government-owned vehicles (GOVs) began at Gwangju Air Base, Republic of Korea. It was around 2300 hours of my first night in country, when my commander woke me up from a jet-lagged stupor. He wanted to know if it was "legal" to transport a bus full of Airmen in the morning to the base exchange at Kunsan Air Base to replenish toiletry and clothing items destroyed during some flooding in our "tent city." He also thought the Airmen needed to recharge their batteries at Kunsan's new gym and its other morale, welfare and recreational (MWR) facilities. I said, "Yes," and spent the rest of my deployment justifying the commander's decision to much of the Peninsula.rnThis article familiarizes judge advocates (JAs) with the proper use of GOVs for "life support" activities in a deployed or remote location. Life support activities, in the context of this discussion, consist of GOV transportation to those places that are "required for the comfort or health and welfare of the member." Life support activities include things such as the chaplain's program, inter-installation athletic competitions, the base exchange/commissary, and MWR programs under certain circumstances. The concepts discussed will help commanders improve mission performance by ensuring that their personnel obtain lawful transportation to morale enhancing life support activities. Of course, the basic rules and principles governing the use of GOVs are the same whether you are located at a large continental United States (CONUS) installation or at a small outpost in Iraq. The application of those rules to a particular set of facts and circumstances at a deployed or remote location, however, can often lead to more permissive results. A "no" at Fort Hood might be a "yes" at Camp Victory. Moreover, several provisions within the rules specifically provide for uses of GOVs in a deployed or remote location that are not available at an adequately serviced CONUS installation.
机译:我对政府拥有车辆(GOV)的兴趣始于大韩民国光州空军基地。我在乡下的第一个晚上大约是2300小时,当时我的指挥官从一架喷气飞机落后的昏迷中唤醒了我。他想知道早上将满载着空军人员的公共汽车运送到昆山空军基地的基地交换所,以补充在我们的“帐篷城市”中遭受水灾破坏的盥洗用品和衣物是否“合法”。他还认为,空军人员需要在昆山的新体育馆及其其他士气,福利和娱乐(MWR)设施中为电池充电。我说“是”,并在余下的部署工作中证明了指挥官对半岛大部分地区的决定。rn本文使法官拥护者(JA)熟悉将GOV正确用于部署或偏远地区的“生命支持”活动。在本次讨论中,生命支持活动包括将GOV运送到“需要会员的舒适或健康和福利”的地方。生命支持活动包括诸如牧师计划,跨部门体育比赛,基地交换/小卖部以及在某些情况下的MWR计划等活动。所讨论的概念将通过确保其人员获得合法运输的士气来提高生活支持活动,从而帮助指挥官提高任务绩效。当然,无论您位于美国大片大陆(CONUS)还是伊拉克的一个小哨所,使用GOV的基本规则和原则都是相同的。但是,将这些规则应用于在部署或远程位置的一组特定的事实和情况,通常会导致更为宽松的结果。胡德堡的“否”可能是胜利营的“是”。此外,规则中的一些规定专门提供了在已部署服务或偏远地区使用GOV的服务,这些服务在获得适当服务的CONUS安装中不可用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The army lawyer》 |2007年第2007期|1-16|共16页
  • 作者

    Thomas H. Dobbs;

  • 作者单位

    United States Air Force;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 军事;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号