首页> 外文期刊>The army lawyer >Negotiated Acquisitions
【24h】

Negotiated Acquisitions

机译:谈判收购

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In Project Resources, Inc., the Government Accountability Office (GAO) placed a high burden on an offeror attempting to gain relief from a proposal lost by the government. The case involved a request for proposals (RFP) for environmental remediation services for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Project Resources timely sent its proposal to the Corps of Engineers, but apparently the government lost its proposal. After the Corps of Engineers failed to award Project Resources one of the five awarded contracts, Project Resources contacted the government who informed the company that its proposal could not be found. Project Resources filed a protest with the GAO along with a copy of the submitted proposal requesting that the GAO direct the agency to evaluate its proposal. The GAO refused, stating the general rule that the "negligent loss of proposal information does not entitle the offeror to relief." Although agencies have a "fundamental obligation" to safeguard information, the overarching goal of having an open playing field for all competitors trumps the "occasional loss" of a contractor's proposal since it would be unfair to allow an offeror reconstruct an offer after the closing date of proposals. Although the GAO conceded that this might be an "arguably harsh result," Project Resources did not provide "pre-closing evidence" of the proposal which might allow the GAO to disturb the Corps of Engineer's decision not to reopen the competition. The Corps of Engineers contracting officer testified that she knew of no other "comparable disappearance of a proposal" within the Sacramento District. This testimony precluded Project Resources from using the limited exception of allowing relief in the case of a "systemic failure resulting in multiple or repetitive instances of lost information."
机译:在Project Resources,Inc.中,政府问责办公室(GAO)给要约人带来了沉重负担,要约人试图从政府丢失的提案中获得救济。该案涉及为美国陆军工程兵团提供环境修复服务的提案请求(RFP)。 Project Resources及时将其提案发送给了工程师团,但显然政府没有采纳该提案。在工程兵团未能授予Project Resources五个授予的合同之一之后,Project Resources与政府联系,政府通知该公司找不到其提议。 Project Resources向GAO提出了抗议,并提交了一份提案的副本,要求GAO指导该机构评估其提案。 GAO拒绝了,并指出一般规则是:“投标信息的过失丢失并不能使要约人享有救济。”尽管代理商有保护信息的“基本义务”,但为所有竞争者提供一个开放的竞争环境的总体目标胜过承包商提议的“偶然损失”,因为让要约人在截止日期之后重建要约是不公平的提案。尽管GAO承认这可能是“可以说是苛刻的结果”,但Project Resources并未提供该提案的“结案证据”,这可能会使GAO干扰工程师团决定不重新参加比赛。工程兵团承包干事作证说,她在萨克拉曼多地区没有其他“可比拟的提案消失”的消息。此证词使Project Resources无法使用有限的例外,即在“系统故障导致丢失信息的多个或重复实例”的情况下允许救济。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号