首页> 外文期刊>The architects' journal >IF THE JURIES HAD BEEN DIFFERENT, THEN SO WOULD SOME OF THE CHOICES
【24h】

IF THE JURIES HAD BEEN DIFFERENT, THEN SO WOULD SOME OF THE CHOICES

机译:如果不同,那么就需要一些选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

On this issues letters page (see page 22),John Lyall takes the AJ to task in part for not editing out Alan Dunlop's negative criticism of Penoyre & Prasad's Moorfields Eye Hospital (see the Building Study, AJ 26.04.07). Since it is not Lyall's building, he cannot be accused of sour grapes. Instead, he seems to feel that it is unfair for the architects of a building that he admires to suffer negative comments from their peers which will, in turn, be read by their peers.
机译:在此问题通知书页面(请参阅第22页)上,约翰·莱尔(John Lyall)接任AJ的任务,部分原因是未编辑Alan Dunlop对Penoyre&Prasad的Moorfields眼科医院的负面批评(请参阅《建筑研究》,AJ 26.04.07)。由于不是Lyall的建筑物,因此不能指责他喝葡萄。相反,他似乎觉得对他敬佩的建筑物的建筑师遭受同行们的负面评价是不公平的,而同行们会反过来阅读。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号