【24h】

Beige Concern

机译:米色的关注

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Four years after the Beige Building Awards replaced the Green Building Awards, the competition is fiercer than ever. It's always a shame there has to be a winner. Depressing, in fact. Feels like ancient history now, the pre-austerity world, with its 'green' this and its 'sustainable' that. And how wasteful it seems, with our New Frugalist hindsight. We squandered so much visual capital. Created buildings that were ecologically sound AND attractive. What a scandalous waste of neural and optical resources. Green. How laughably inappropriate for these joyless times we now trudge through. Of course it takes a dazzlingly ordinary building to win a beige accolade. The stakes are lower than ever. Austerity Chic' is now merely the name of a pub tribute band. As usual the judges were looking for that magic post-green combination of 'economically prim' and 'spectacularly dull'. As I say, it's a shame there has to be a winner and to be honest this year we couldn't be arsed to pick one.
机译:在“米色建筑奖”取代“绿色建筑奖”四年之后,比赛比以往任何时候都更加激烈。必须要有赢家总是很可惜。实际上令人沮丧。现在的感觉就像是古老的历史,紧缩的世界,以及它的“绿色”和“可持续”的感觉。用我们的新节俭主义事后看来,这看起来多么浪费。我们浪费了太多的视觉资本。创造出具有生态学意义和吸引力的建筑。多么浪费神经和光学资源。绿色。现在,我们艰难地度过了这段艰难的时光,这真可笑。当然,要赢得米色的赞誉,就需要一幢令人眼花ordinary乱的普通建筑。赌注比以往任何时候都低。 Austerity Chic'现在只是酒吧致敬乐队的名称。像往常一样,法官们正在寻找“经济上的优势”和“壮观的钝化”的神奇的后绿色组合。就像我说的那样,必须要有一个赢家真是太可惜了,说实话,今年我们不敢挑一个。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The architects' journal》 |2013年第1期|58-58|共1页
  • 作者

    Ian Martin;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:32:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号