【24h】

From the editor

机译:来自编辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

What a fantastically obvious, simple, and profound point Joseph Rykwert made when he wrote that in 1963, for his book The Idea of a Town. It came to mind following the airing of David Chipperfield's view on London, in relation to Berlin, earlier this week. In the German capital, 'there is still an idea of the public realm,' he said. In London, however, 'we have given that up. We have declared the public realm dead; the question is how to get stuff out of the private sector. We are unbelievably sophisticated at that.' Was Chipperfield thinking of the Garden Bridge, that much-heralded 'public asset' that will prohibit groups of eight or more from walking across it unless they've received prior permission, be closed from midnight to 6am, and bar cyclists? He didn't say, but he may as well have been.
机译:约瑟夫·雷克韦特(Joseph Rykwert)在1963年为他的著作《城镇的想法》(The Idea of​​ a Town)撰写的书中,这是一个非常明显,简单而深刻的观点。在本周早些时候,大卫·奇珀菲尔德(David Chipperfield)就伦敦(相对于柏林)发表的观点开始浮现。他说,在德国首都,仍然存在公共领域的观念。但是,在伦敦,我们已经放弃了。我们宣布公共领域已经消亡。问题是如何从私营部门获取东西。我们在这方面令人难以置信。”奇珀菲尔德是否想过花园桥,一种广为人知的“公共财产”,除非获得事先许可,否则将禁止八人或八人以上的团体走过花园桥,午夜至凌晨6点关闭,并禁止骑自行车的人吗?他没有说,但他也可能一直在说。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The architects' journal》 |2014年第21期|5-5|共1页
  • 作者

    Rory Olcayto;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:32:01

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号