【24h】

From the editor

机译:来自编辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In Maria Smith's comment piece on the Stephen Lawrence Prize, the shortlist of which we spotlight this week, she begins by saying it is 'by no means a runner-up award'. Interesting. Why? Who said it was? Maybe no one has come out and said the Stephen Lawrence Prize is a second-tier gong in quite so many words, as Smith's opening gambit seems to imply, but the RIBA's shortlisting process suggests that that is precisely what it is. Why? Because any award that draws its shortlist from regional RIBA award winners, as the Manser Medal and the Stephen Lawrence Prize do, clearly isn't, as Alex Ferguson might say, a 'top, top' award. The Stirling Prize doesn't shortlist regional winners - and neither should the Special Awards.
机译:在玛丽亚·史密斯(Maria Smith)对斯蒂芬·劳伦斯奖(Stephen Lawrence Prize)的评论中,她本周将入围该名单,她首先说这“绝对不是亚军”。有趣。为什么?谁说的也许没有人说史蒂芬·劳伦斯奖是这么多话的二线锣,正如史密斯的开场白话似乎暗示的那样,但是RIBA的入围程序表明这就是事实。为什么?因为像曼瑟奖章和史蒂芬·劳伦斯奖一样,任何从区域RIBA获奖者中脱颖而出的奖项,显然都不是“最高,最高”的奖项,正如亚历克斯·弗格森(Alex Ferguson)可能说的那样。斯特灵奖并没有入围地区冠军,特别奖也没有入围。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The architects' journal》 |2014年第8期|5-5|共1页
  • 作者

    Rory Olcayto;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:32:00

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号