【24h】

From the editor

机译:来自编辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When it was announced in October last year that Chinese developer ZhongRong Group was going to build a new Crystal Palace in the south London park, and on the footprint of Joseph Paxton's vanished original, it seemed a little far-fetched. Despite London Mayor Boris Johnsons press conference on the sweeping steps that lead to the ill-fated site (the monumental greenhouse caught fire on four separate occasions during its time on the Sydenham site, in 1866, in 1923, conclusively in 1936 and then once more in 1950, which erased it almost completely), there was an air of disbelief surrounding the proposal. And unlike, say, the 2012 Olympics project, which, from the moment London was announced as host city in 2005, captured the public's imagination, few jumped for joy at the prospect of seeing the palace rebuilt.
机译:去年10月,中国开发商中融集团宣布要在伦敦南部公园建造一座新的水晶宫,而在约瑟夫·帕克斯顿消失的原址上,这似乎有些牵强。尽管伦敦市长鲍里斯·约翰逊(Boris Johnsons)举行了新闻发布会,讨论了导致命运多site的遗址的艰巨步骤(这座巨大的温室在1866年,1923年在Sydenham遗址上曾四次分别着火,最终在1936年,然后又一次在1950年(几乎完全抹掉了它)之后,对该提案充满了怀疑的气氛。比方说,与2012年奥运会项目不同,该项目从2005年伦敦宣布为东道主城市开始,就吸引了公众的想象力,很少有人为看到这座宫殿被重建而高兴。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The architects' journal》 |2014年第8期|5-5|共1页
  • 作者

    Rory Olcayto;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:31:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号