首页> 外文期刊>Telematics and Informatics >Efficiency comparison of digital content providers with different pricing strategies
【24h】

Efficiency comparison of digital content providers with different pricing strategies

机译:不同定价策略的数字内容提供商的效率比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Unlike traditional products, digital content can be offered free because the marginal cost required for additional production is close to zero. Since free digital content is offered at a lower price than that of the competitors, it is a strategy that can beat the competition. However, digital content firms use various strategies, such as the advertising sales-based strategy, freemium strategy, and membership fee-based strategy. This study categorizes Korea's digital content firms into three groups based on the pricing strategy and uses the meta-frontier analysis method in order to determine which group's production function is closer to the meta-frontier production function. In addition, Tobit regression is used to analyze whether the differences in the efficiency levels between groups are statistically significant. The results reveal that the free group has the highest efficiency, followed by the fee group and the mix group in that order. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:与传统产品不同,数字内容可以免费提供,因为额外生产所需的边际成本几乎为零。由于免费数字内容的价格低于竞争对手,因此这是一种可以击败竞争对手的策略。但是,数字内容公司使用各种策略,例如基于广告销售的策略,免费增值策略和基于会员费的策略。本研究基于定价策略将韩国的数字内容公司分为三类,并使用元边界分析方法来确定哪个组的生产功能更接近元边界生产功能。此外,Tobit回归用于分析各组之间效率水平的差异是否在统计上显着。结果表明,免费组的效率最高,其次是收费组和混合组。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号