...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecommunications Reports >High Court Justices Challenge AT&T Privacy Claim in FOIA Case
【24h】

High Court Justices Challenge AT&T Privacy Claim in FOIA Case

机译:高等法院法官在FOIA案件中挑战AT&T隐私权索赔

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

An attorney representing AT&T, Inc., came under fire from several Supreme Court justices who, during a recent oral argument, questioned claims by the telecom giant that it should be entitled to a "personal privacy" exemption outlined under the Freedom of Information Act. The justices said they had never heard of a company seek such an exemption and that Congress had never specifically raised such protection for corporations. At issue in FCC v. AT&T (case no. 09-1279) is AT&T's assertion that the FCC was not permitted to turn over records that detailed work it had done for the New London, Conn., school district through the "E-rate" program because corporations are among entities covered under the personal privacy exemption outlined under FOIA, known as Exemption 7(C). Justices representing both wings of the high court challenged AT&T attorney Geoffrey Klineberg to produce examples where the protection of corporate interests had been referred to as personal privacy. He could not.
机译:代表美国电话电报公司(AT&T,Inc.)的律师遭到最高法院几位法官的抨击,他们在最近的一次口头辩论中对电信巨头声称其应享有《信息自由法》概述的“个人隐私”豁免权提出的质疑。法官们说,他们从未听说过一家公司寻求这种豁免,而且国会从未专门为公司提供这种保护。在FCC诉AT&T案(第09-1279号案件)中,AT&T断言,不允许FCC通过“电子费率”移交其为康涅狄格州新伦敦学区所做的详细工作的记录。 ”,因为公司属于FOIA概述的个人隐私豁免(称为豁免7(C))所涵盖的实体之列。代表高等法院两翼的法官对AT&T律师Geoffrey Klineberg提出了质疑,提出了将公司利益保护称为个人隐私的例子。他不能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号