...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecom A.M >DISMISSAL UPHELD IN SUIT ACCUSING QWEST OF KILLING CLEC
【24h】

DISMISSAL UPHELD IN SUIT ACCUSING QWEST OF KILLING CLEC

机译:杀死CLEC的西装对QWEST的偏好

获取原文

摘要

A lawsuit blaming Qwest for the demise of competitive carrier Firstcom was properly dismissed, ruled the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis. Firstcom went out of business in 2001 and sold its assets to Al Jaffe & Associates. In 2004, shareholders of the original Firstcom blamed Qwest for the company's fate, saying the big carrier had given additional services and better customer support to two other CLECs, Eschelon Telecom and McLeod USA. The district court dismissed the case, saying the shareholders lacked legal standing because Al Jaffe owned the company. In 2006, Al Jaffe took up the lawsuit against Qwest, but the court again dismissed, saying it was too late to renew the claim. The 8th Circuit agreed: "Section 415(b) of the Act mandates a two-year limitations period for '[a]ll complaints against carriers for the recovery of damages.'" Firstcom shouldn't be exempted from the rule, because the company's "delay in bringing the action is attributable to its own actions," the court added.
机译:谴责Qwest导致竞争性运营商Firstcom的死亡的诉讼已被适当驳回,这是美国圣路易斯第八巡回上诉法院的一项裁决。 Firstcom于2001年停业,并将其资产出售给Al Jaffe&Associates。 2004年,最初的Firstcom的股东将Qwest的命运归咎于Qwest,称这家大型电信运营商为另外两家CLEC(埃舍尔电信和McLeod USA)提供了额外的服务和更好的客户支持。地区法院驳回了该案,称股东由于Al Jaffe拥有公司而缺乏合法地位。 2006年,Al Jaffe提起了针对Qwest的诉讼,但法院再次驳回了上诉,称重新提出索赔为时已晚。第八巡回法院同意:“该法第415(b)条规定了“对运营商的所有投诉以追回损害赔偿的赔偿期”为两年。” Firstcom不应免除该规则,因为法院补充说,该公司“提起诉讼的延迟归因于其自身的诉讼”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M 》 |2009年第26期| P.1-1| 共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号