【24h】

Cable

机译:电缆

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit asked Comcast to file a response to the TennisnChannel’s en banc appeal of the D.C. Circuit's decision in its program carriage case with Comcast, whichnwas decided in the operator’s favor May 28. “En Banc appeals are rarely granted,” Fletcher Heald appellatenlawyer Harry Cole, who is not affiliated with the case, told us. He said the request for a response indicatesna majority of judges are interested in possibly rehearing the case. The request for a response doesn’tnmean a rehearing will happen, but it’s a sign it could, he said. “We appreciate the circuit court’s ongoingnconsideration of our appeal in this important case,” said a Tennis Channel spokesman. Comcast's responsento the court is due Aug. 5. “Three judges on the court roundly rejected the FCC’s case on multiplenindependent grounds, and the Commission chose not to challenge the court’s ruling," said a Comcastnspokesperson by email. "We believe the ruling of the three-judge panel will be upheld if the court choosesnto hear the case again.”
机译:美国直流巡回上诉法院要求康卡斯特对网球网球场就直流巡回法院在其与康卡斯特的程序运输案中的决定进行的全盘上诉做出回应,该案在5月28日获得了运营商的青睐。 ,与该案无关的弗莱彻·希尔德(Fletcher Heald)主审律师哈里·科尔(Harry Cole)告诉我们。他说,要求作出答复的请求表明,大多数法官都对重新审理此案感兴趣。他说,要求答复并不意味着要进行预演,但这是可以的。网球频道发言人说:“我们感谢巡回法庭在这一重要案件中一直在考虑我们的上诉,”康卡斯特对法院的回应将于8月5日到期。“一名三位法官基于多重独立理由全面驳回了FCC的案件,委员会选择不对法院的裁决提出异议,”康卡斯特发言人说,“我们相信该裁决。如果法院选择不再次审理此案,则由三名法官组成的小组将维持原判。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M.》 |2013年第143期|25-25|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号