...
首页> 外文期刊>Tectonics >Site and Timing of Substantial India-Asia Collision Inferred From Crustal Volume Budget
【24h】

Site and Timing of Substantial India-Asia Collision Inferred From Crustal Volume Budget

机译:从地壳体积预算推断出的严重的亚洲-亚洲碰撞的地点和时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It is widely assumed that the India-Asia collision initiated at 55 5 Ma along the Indus-Yarlung suture zone. Paradoxically, however, the majority of tectonic responses to collision as well as the accelerated faunal exchange between the two continents did not occur until circa 35-30 Ma and intense deformation and uplift occurred along the southern side of the Tibetan Himalaya rather than the Indus-Yarlung suture zone. Additionally, this widely accepted scenario requires large-scale subduction of buoyant continental crust into the dense mantle, which is inconsistent with tectonic reconstructions of Gondwana as well as the general knowledge of physics. Here we present evidence from crustal volume budget calculations to show that (1) at 55 5 Ma 2,100 840 km of oceanic lithosphere existed between India and the Lhasa Block and hence India-Asia collision is unlikely to have occurred at that time, (2) substantial India-Asia collision should have occurred after this large region of oceanic lithosphere had been consumed by subduction, along the south side of Tibetan Himalaya diachronously at 32 2 Ma in the west, 23 2 Ma in the east and 18 +/- 2 Ma in the center, and (3) no large-scale subduction of continental crust occurred during India-Asia collision. These findings resolve the problematic issues that have not been satisfactorily explained by many existing models for the system and suggest that the evolution of the Himalaya-Tibet orogen and many existing geodynamic models of India-Asia collision requires critical reassessment.Plain Language Summary India-Asia collision, which built the spectacular Himalaya-Tibet orogen, is widely considered to have commenced at circa 55 Ma along the Indus-Yarlung suture zone, but apparent paradoxes have made this widely accepted scenario difficult to understand. Based upon an analysis from crustal volume budgets, a common method for the restoration of tectonic deformation, we suggest that the India-Asia collision is unlikely to have occurred at circa 55 Ma along the Indus-Yarlung suture zone but instead most likely commenced after circa 32 Ma along the south side of Tibetan Himalaya. Our findings provide reasonable explanations for the problematic issues that cannot be explained by the many existing models that propose that India-Asia collision occurred at circa 55 Ma.
机译:人们普遍认为,印度-亚洲碰撞是在印度-雅隆缝合带沿55 5 Ma开始的。然而,自相矛盾的是,两大洲对碰撞的大部分构造响应以及动物群交换的加速直到约35-30 Ma才发生,并且强烈的变形和隆升发生在西藏喜马拉雅山的南侧而不是印度洋-雅鲁缝合带。此外,这种被广泛接受的方案要求将浮力的大陆壳大规模俯冲到稠密的地幔中,这与冈瓦纳的构造重建以及物理学的常识相矛盾。在这里,我们从地壳容积预算计算中得出的证据表明:(1)印度与拉萨地块之间存在55 5 Ma 2,100 840 km的海洋岩石圈,因此当时不太可能发生印亚碰撞;(2)在俯冲吞没了这个大片的岩石圈之后,应该发生了大面积的印度-亚洲碰撞,这是沿着喜马拉雅山脉的南侧,西时32 Ma,东时23 2 Ma,东时18 +/- 2 Ma (3)印度—亚洲碰撞期间没有发生大范围的大陆壳俯冲。这些发现解决了该系统的许多现有模型未能令人满意地解释的问题,并表明喜马拉雅-西藏造山带的演化以及印度-亚洲碰撞的许多现有地球动力学模型都需要进行重新评估。碰撞形成了壮观的喜玛拉雅-西藏造山带,人们普遍认为它是沿着印度河-雅隆缝合带在约55 Ma处开始的,但是明显的悖论使这种被广泛接受的情况难以理解。根据地壳体积预算(一种恢复构造变形的常用方法)进行的分析,我们认为,印度-亚洲碰撞不太可能发生在沿印度河-雅隆缝合带的约55 Ma处,而是最有可能在大约20沿喜马拉雅山南侧32 Ma。我们的发现为有问题的问题提供了合理的解释,而现有的许多模型都无法解释这些问题,这些模型提出印度-亚洲碰撞发生在大约55 Ma。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Tectonics》 |2019年第8期|2275-2290|共16页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    China Univ Petr State Key Lab Petr Resources & Prospecting Beijing Peoples R China|China Univ Petr Coll Geosci Beijing Peoples R China;

    China Univ Petr Coll Geosci Beijing Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    India-Asia collision; collision site; collision timing; crustal volume budget;

    机译:印亚碰撞;碰撞部位碰撞时间;地壳体积预算;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号