首页> 外文期刊>Technology and Culture >Demythologizing Innovation: Steven Usselman, Regulating Railroad Innovation
【24h】

Demythologizing Innovation: Steven Usselman, Regulating Railroad Innovation

机译:揭秘创新:史蒂芬·乌瑟尔曼(Steven Usselman),规范铁路创新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the United States, economic and business history and a great deal of the history of technology have been dogged by claims that market forces automatically yield efficiency, rationality, utility, and innovation: "Build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door." Such claims posit straight-line linkages between good ideas and their realization; whenever that does not happen, look for the weasel (or should I say rat?) who upset the natural order. The resulting literature is often adversarial, more interested in scoring points than explaining complex phenomena. It serves badly as a platform on which to explore the extraordinary interconnections that occur when creative minds produce tools, technologies, systems of technologies, businesses, industries, commercial-social complexes, political economies―in short, the history of technology in context over time. Steven Usselman's Regulating Railroad Innovation: Business, Technology, and Politics in America, 1840-1920 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002, $65) calls historians back to what we do best: empirical study of what happened and how people tried to deal with it in their own times. Such is the historian's unique contribution to scholarly inquiry, and in this case it repays any reader's investment many, many times over. Those of you who have taken the "literary turn" bear with me for a moment. I know we construct these cultural realities and impose hegemonic narratives on hopelessly imperfect documents; but when confronting flat-footed positivists left over from the nineteenth century we cannot afford to join you yet on the other side of the postmodern looking glass.
机译:在美国,有人声称市场力量会自动产生效率,合理性,实用性和创新性,这困扰着经济和商业历史以及许多技术史:你的门。”这种主张在好主意和实现之间建立了直线联系;每当这种情况没有发生时,请寻找破坏自然秩序的鼬鼠(或者我应该说老鼠?)。由此产生的文献通常是对抗性的,比解释复杂的现象更关心得分。它严重地无法作为一个平台,用于探索当创意思维产生工具,技术,技术系统,业务,行业,商业社会综合体,政治经济时发生的非凡相互联系,简而言之,就是随着时间的流逝而产生的技术历史。史蒂文·乌瑟尔曼(Steven Usselman)的《调节铁路创新:美国的商业,技术和政治》,1840-1920年(纽约:剑桥大学出版社,2002年,65美元)使历史学家回到我们最擅长的领域:对发生的事情以及人们如何应对的实证研究。在自己的时代。这是历史学家对学术研究的独特贡献,在这种情况下,它可以无数次地偿还任何读者的投资。那些经历了“文学转折”的人们在我身边生了片刻。我知道我们建构了这些文化现实,并将霸权叙事强加给了绝望的,不完美的文件。但是,当您面对19世纪遗留下来的措手不及的实证主义者时,我们还无法与您一起站在后现代眼镜的另一端。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号