...
首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Editor's introduction: Distributional consequences of emerging technologies
【24h】

Editor's introduction: Distributional consequences of emerging technologies

机译:编者按:新兴技术的分布后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Emerging technologies have a great potential to exacerbate inequalities. The papers in this special section represent case studies of the ways five different technologies interacted with particular national contexts to produce distributional effects. A central hypothesis of the study was that the same technological project would have different distributional consequences under different national conditions; this was confirmed. Public interventions shaped the trajectories of the technological project through intellectual property and anti-trust provisions as well as regulations, much more than through the research agenda itself. These technologies were not associated with large gains or losses in jobs, but rather with modest shifts downward in numbers and upwards in skill requirements. Price was not the only determinant of how far the technologies diffused; skills and infrastructure were also important. In sum, distributional consequences take many forms. "Diffusion" consists of both push and pull, need and absorptive capacity. The relevant decision makers are in both the public and private sectors, and a broad range of policies affects this process, not just science, technology, and innovation policies. There are many options for public intervention, but no one size fits all countries.
机译:新兴技术具有加剧不平等的巨大潜力。本节中的论文代表了对五种不同技术与特定国家环境相互作用以产生分配效应的方式的案例研究。该研究的主要假设是,同一技术项目在不同的国家条件下会产生不同的分配结果。这被证实。公共干预通过知识产权,反托拉斯规定以及法规来塑造技术项目的轨迹,远远超过了研究议程本身。这些技术与大量的工作得失无关,而与人数的适度下降和技能要求的上升有关。价格并不是决定技术普及程度的唯一决定因素。技能和基础设施也很重要。总而言之,分配后果有多种形式。 “扩散”包括推拉,需求和吸收能力。相关决策者在公共部门和私营部门中,广泛的政策会影响这一过程,而不仅仅是科学,技术和创新政策。有很多可供公众干预的选择,但没有一个适合所有国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号