...
首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Democratic revolutions as institutional innovation diffusion: Rapid adoption and survival of democracy
【24h】

Democratic revolutions as institutional innovation diffusion: Rapid adoption and survival of democracy

机译:民主革命作为制度创新的传播:民主的迅速采用和生存

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recent 'democratic revolutions' in Islamic countries call for a re-consideration of transitions to and from democracy. Transitions to democracy have often been considered the outcome of socio-economic modernization and therefore slow and incremental processes. But as a recent study has made clear, in the last century, transitions to democracy have mainly occurred through rapid leaps rather than slow and incremental steps. Here, we therefore apply an innovation and systems perspective and consider transitions to democracy as processes of institutional, and therefore systemic, innovation adoption. We show that transitions to democracy starting before 1900 lasted for an average of 50 years and a median of 56 years, while transitions originating later took an average of 4.6 years and a median of 1.7 years. However, our results indicate that the survival time of democratic regimes is longer in cases where the transition periods have also been longer, suggesting that patience paid in previous democratizations. We identify a critical 'consolidation-preparing' transition period of 12 years. Our results also show that in cases where the transitions have not been made directly from autocracy to democracy, there are no main institutional paths towards democracy. Instead, democracy seems reachable from a variety of directions. This is in line with the analogy of diffusion of innovations at the nation systems level, for which assumptions are that potential adopter systems may vary in susceptibility over time. The adoption of the institutions of democracy therefore corresponds to the adoption of a new political communications standard for a nation, in this case the innovation of involving in principle all adult citizens on an equal basis.
机译:伊斯兰国家最近的“民主革命”要求重新考虑与民主之间的过渡。向民主过渡通常被认为是社会经济现代化的结果,因此是缓慢而渐进的过程。但是,正如最近的一项研究表明的那样,在上个世纪,向民主的过渡主要是通过快速的跳跃而不是缓慢而渐进的步骤发生的。因此,在这里,我们从创新和系统的角度出发,将向民主的过渡视为制度性,系统性的创新采用过程。我们表明,从1900年开始的民主过渡平均持续了50年,平均时间为56年,而后来开始的过渡平均持续了4.6年,平均时间为1.7年。但是,我们的结果表明,在过渡时期也更长的情况下,民主政权的生存时间更长,这表明在先前的民主化过程中付出了耐心。我们确定关键的“准备合并”过渡期为12年。我们的结果还表明,在没有直接从专制民主过渡到民主的情况下,没有通往民主的主要体制路径。相反,民主似乎可以从各种方向实现。这与在国家系统层面上传播创新的类推相一致,在这种假设下,潜在的采用者系统的敏感性可能会随时间而变化。因此,采用民主制度相当于采用一个国家的新政治通讯标准,在这种情况下,原则上应使所有成年公民平等地参与创新。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Technological forecasting and social change 》 |2013年第8期| 1546-1556| 共11页
  • 作者单位

    Centre for the Study of Cultural Evolution, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden,Institute for Futures Studies, Box 591, SE 101 31 Stockholm, Sweden;

    Centre for the Study of Cultural Evolution, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden;

    Centre for the Study of Cultural Evolution, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden,School of Social and Health Sciences, Halmstad University, Box 823, SE-301 18 Halmstad, Sweden;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Democracy; Autocracy; Transitions; Consolidation; Institutions; Revolutions;

    机译:民主;专制;过渡;合并;机构;革命;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号