...
首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Technological inclusiveness: Northern versus Chinese induced technologies in the garment industry
【24h】

Technological inclusiveness: Northern versus Chinese induced technologies in the garment industry

机译:技术包容性:服装业中北方与中国的诱导技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Northern economies have been the main sources of technologies for the global garment manufacturing industry. Over the past decade, China has become an important alternative source of these technologies offering a range of technological choices for small scale and dispersed production of cheap consumer goods, particularly in the developing world. Preceding a national foresight exercise aimed at enhancing the capabilities of small-scale garment producers in Uganda, we examine the potential 'inclusiveness' of garment sewing, machines imported from the Northern economies and China, and their individual potential to enhance the capabilities of poor garment producers, particularly, women and rural dwellers. Data for our study included a survey and semi-structured interviews with 147 garment firms and other key informants. Compared to the Chinese sewing machines, we found that the Northern machines have high acquisition cost, relies on scale and advanced infrastructure, and tend to exclude poor rural producers (often women). The transfer of Chinese technologies to Uganda, we also found is much easier, have larger spread effects, leading to smaller gaps in technological know-how between China and Uganda because of the context in which Chinese technological innovations are induced. We conclude with some implication of our study to theory and policy. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:北部经济一直是全球服装制造业的主要技术来源。在过去的十年中,中国已经成为这些技术的重要替代来源,为廉价消费品的小规模和分散生产提供了一系列技术选择,特别是在发展中国家。在进行旨在提高乌干达小型服装生产商能力的全国性远见卓识之前,我们研究了服装缝制,从北方经济体和中国进口的机器的潜在“包容性”,以及它们各自增强劣质服装能力的潜力。生产者,特别是妇女和农村居民。我们研究的数据包括对147家服装公司和其他主要信息提供者的调查和半结构式访谈。与中国的缝纫机相比,我们发现,北方的缝纫机购置成本高,依赖规模和先进的基础设施,而且往往将贫穷的农村生产者(通常是女性)排除在外。我们还发现,中国技术向乌干达的转让要容易得多,传播效果更大,由于中国技术创新的背景,导致中乌之间的技术知识差距较小。最后,我们的研究对理论和政策有一定的暗示。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Technological forecasting and social change 》 |2017年第6期| 310-322| 共13页
  • 作者单位

    Open Univ, Dev Policy & Practice, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England;

    Univ West England, Bristol Business Sch, Frenchay Campus, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England|Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Inst Stat Studies & Econ Knowledge, Res Lab Sci & Technol Studies, Myasnitskaya St 20, Moscow, Russia;

    Univ West England, Bristol Business Sch, Frenchay Campus, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Africa; China; Garment industry; Technology inclusiveness; Uganda;

    机译:非洲;中国;服装业;技术包容性;乌干达;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号